2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/2336/13463
Title:
Specificity and nonspecificity in psychotherapy
Authors:
Craighead, W.E; Sheets, E.S; Bjornsson, A.S; Arnarson, E.O
Citation:
Clinical Psychology Science and Practice 2005, 12(2):189-93
Issue Date:
1-Jun-2005
Abstract:
DeRubeis et al. (this issue) offer a data-based critique of two arguments frequently presented in support of the "nonspecifics" hypothesis. This commentary supports their report of superior effects for specific treatments for specific disorders and provides some additional data to support their position. We maintain, however, that current research has not adequately evaluated nonspecific effects so that theoretical conclusions can be drawn regarding the mechanisms of change of the superior treatments. DeRubeis et al. present some data to suggest that nonspecific effects, particularly the therapeutic alliance, are a result of therapy outcome rather than causal in therapeutic change. We argue, to the contrary, that adequate research remains to be done regarding nonspecific effects, and when that research is completed, what are now called nonspecific effects will be more aptly labeled previously unspecified effects.
Description:
To access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Link
Additional Links:
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1093/clipsy.bpi024

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorCraighead, W.E-
dc.contributor.authorSheets, E.S-
dc.contributor.authorBjornsson, A.S-
dc.contributor.authorArnarson, E.O-
dc.date.accessioned2007-09-03T13:16:40Z-
dc.date.available2007-09-03T13:16:40Z-
dc.date.issued2005-06-01-
dc.date.submitted2007-09-03-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Psychology Science and Practice 2005, 12(2):189-93en
dc.identifier.issn0969-5893-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/clipsy/bpi024-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2336/13463-
dc.descriptionTo access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Linken
dc.description.abstractDeRubeis et al. (this issue) offer a data-based critique of two arguments frequently presented in support of the "nonspecifics" hypothesis. This commentary supports their report of superior effects for specific treatments for specific disorders and provides some additional data to support their position. We maintain, however, that current research has not adequately evaluated nonspecific effects so that theoretical conclusions can be drawn regarding the mechanisms of change of the superior treatments. DeRubeis et al. present some data to suggest that nonspecific effects, particularly the therapeutic alliance, are a result of therapy outcome rather than causal in therapeutic change. We argue, to the contrary, that adequate research remains to be done regarding nonspecific effects, and when that research is completed, what are now called nonspecific effects will be more aptly labeled previously unspecified effects.en
dc.language.isoisen
dc.publisherBlackwellen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1093/clipsy.bpi024en
dc.subject.meshPlacebo Effecten
dc.subject.meshTherapeutic allianceen
dc.titleSpecificity and nonspecificity in psychotherapyen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.format.digYES-
All Items in Hirsla are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.