Search:
Browse by
Collection All
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
Listed communities
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Hirsla - Landspítali University Hospital > Journal Articles, Peer Reviewed (Ritrýndar vísindagreinar) > English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)  > Incidental Detection of Renal Cell Carcinoma is an Independent Prognostic Marker: Results of a Long-Term, Whole Population Study.


Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2336/200749
    Del.icio.us     LinkedIn     Citeulike     Connotea     Facebook     Stumble it!



Title: Incidental Detection of Renal Cell Carcinoma is an Independent Prognostic Marker: Results of a Long-Term, Whole Population Study.
Authors: Palsdottir, Helga Bjork
Hardarson, Sverrir
Petursdottir, Vigdis
Jonsson, Armann
Jonsson, Eirikur
Sigurdsson, Martin Ingi
Einarsson, Gudmundur Vikar
Gudbjartsson, Tomas
Citation: Incidental Detection of Renal Cell Carcinoma is an Independent Prognostic Marker: Results of a Long-Term, Whole Population Study. 2012, 187 (1):48-53 J. Urol.
Issue date: Jan-2012
Abstract: The true effect of incidental detection on the survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma has been debated. We used centralized databases in Iceland to study prognostic factors of survival, focusing on the effect of incidental detection.
This retrospective study included all living patients diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma in Iceland from 1971 to 2005. Hospital charts and histology were reviewed. Incidentally diagnosed renal cell carcinomas were compared to symptomatic tumors and prognostic factors were evaluated using Cox multivariate analysis.
Of the 910 patients 254 (27.9%) were diagnosed incidentally, most often by abdominal ultrasound (29.5%) or computerized tomography (28.3%). The incidental detection rate increased from 11.1% in 1971 through 1975 to 39.2% in 2001 through 2005 (p <0.001). During the same period the incidence increased significantly in males but in females only during the last 5 study years. Mortality remained unchanged for each gender. Incidentally detected tumors were an average of 2.6 cm smaller and diagnosed at lower stage and lower grade than symptomatic tumors. Age and histology were similar in each group. TNM stage was by far the strongest independent prognostic factor of survival but age, calendar year of diagnosis and ESR were also significant. After correcting for confounders patients with symptomatic renal cell carcinoma had worse survival than those diagnosed incidentally.
With increased incidence and unchanged mortality the survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma has improved. This is mainly related to a steep increase in incidental detection. Incidental detection affects survival favorably and to a greater extent than can be explained by lower stage compared to the survival of patients diagnosed with symptoms.
Additional Links: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022534711049706
Appears in collections:English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)

Files in this item:

There are no files associated with this item.



Related articles on PubMed
bullet
Effect of incidental detection for survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma: results of population-based study of 701 patients.
Gudbjartsson T, Thoroddsen A, Petursdottir V, Hardarson S, Magnusson J, Einarsson GV
2005 Dec
bullet
Renal cell carcinoma: prognostic significance of incidentally detected tumors.
Tsui KH, Shvarts O, Smith RB, Figlin R, de Kernion JB, Belldegrun A
2000 Feb
bullet
bullet
[Renal cell carcinoma diagnosed at autopsy in Iceland 1971-2005].
Jonsson A, Hardarson S, Petursdottir V, Palsdottir HB, Jonsson E, Einarsson GV, Gudbjartsson T
2008 Dec
bullet
Renal cell carcinoma: incidental detection and pathological staging.
Siow WY, Yip SK, Ng LG, Tan PH, Cheng WS, Foo KT
2000 Oct
See all 100 articles

All items in Hirsla are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

OR Logo Powered by Open Repository
Valid XHTML 1.0!