2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/2336/3401
Title:
Nordic gynecologists' opinion on quality assessment registers
Authors:
Dueholm, Margit; Rokkones, Erik; Löfgren, Mats; Härkki, Päivi; Arason, Gudmundur
Citation:
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004, 83(6):563-9
Issue Date:
2004
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: The Board of the Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology established a Quality Group for Gynecological Surgery connected with benign diseases with one member from each of the Nordic countries. The aim was to suggest guidelines for the quality assessment of such surgery. METHODS: A questionnaire study was carried out in all Nordic gynecological departments concerning quality assessment and the elaboration of guidelines. RESULTS: Most of the departments (80.4%) want to participate in establishing and maintaining a quality register. The majority of responders strongly agree that registers detect areas of satisfactory as well as unsatisfactory quality, and are necessary for comparison of treatment results among departments. Several departments are hesitant about joining a register if it will incur financial costs (59.5%) and/or extra work (47.6%). Most departments (71.4-94.6%) consider that all major gynecological surgery should be monitored. The departments agree that pre-, per-, and post hospital patient events should be included in any register. These results are incorporated into common general guidelines for quality assessment of gynecological surgery in the Nordic countries. CONCLUSION: The gynecological departments in the Nordic countries agree on the necessity for and the main content of registers for quality assessment, but the interest drops when extra work is needed, and if the departments have to pay to participate, which emphasize the need for simple and low-cost registers. In accordance with the results of the Nordic questionnaire, common general quality guidelines for gynecological surgery are suggested.
Additional Links:
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00514.x

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorDueholm, Margit-
dc.contributor.authorRokkones, Erik-
dc.contributor.authorLöfgren, Mats-
dc.contributor.authorHärkki, Päivi-
dc.contributor.authorArason, Gudmundur-
dc.date.accessioned2006-07-11T13:01:35Z-
dc.date.available2006-07-11T13:01:35Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationActa Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004, 83(6):563-9en
dc.identifier.issn0001-6349-
dc.identifier.pmid15144339-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00514.x-
dc.identifier.otherOAG12en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2336/3401-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The Board of the Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology established a Quality Group for Gynecological Surgery connected with benign diseases with one member from each of the Nordic countries. The aim was to suggest guidelines for the quality assessment of such surgery. METHODS: A questionnaire study was carried out in all Nordic gynecological departments concerning quality assessment and the elaboration of guidelines. RESULTS: Most of the departments (80.4%) want to participate in establishing and maintaining a quality register. The majority of responders strongly agree that registers detect areas of satisfactory as well as unsatisfactory quality, and are necessary for comparison of treatment results among departments. Several departments are hesitant about joining a register if it will incur financial costs (59.5%) and/or extra work (47.6%). Most departments (71.4-94.6%) consider that all major gynecological surgery should be monitored. The departments agree that pre-, per-, and post hospital patient events should be included in any register. These results are incorporated into common general guidelines for quality assessment of gynecological surgery in the Nordic countries. CONCLUSION: The gynecological departments in the Nordic countries agree on the necessity for and the main content of registers for quality assessment, but the interest drops when extra work is needed, and if the departments have to pay to participate, which emphasize the need for simple and low-cost registers. In accordance with the results of the Nordic questionnaire, common general quality guidelines for gynecological surgery are suggested.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBlackwellen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00514.xen
dc.subjectAttitude of Health Personnelen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectGynecologic Surgical Proceduresen
dc.subjectGynecologyen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectNorwayen
dc.subjectPractice Guidelinesen
dc.subjectQuality Assurance, Health Careen
dc.subjectQuestionnairesen
dc.subjectRegistriesen
dc.subjectResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'ten
dc.titleNordic gynecologists' opinion on quality assessment registersen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.format.digYES-

Related articles on PubMed

All Items in Hirsla are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.