Psychiatric and psychological evidence in the Supreme Court of Iceland - 2001 to 2007.
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Gudjonsson, Gisli HSigurdsson, Jon Fridrik
Sveinsdottir, Bryndis
Arnardottir, Helga
Jonsson, Thorsteinn A
Issue Date
2010-08-01
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Nord J Psychiatry. 2010, 64(4):283-7Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about expert psychiatric and psychological evidence in appeal cases. AIMS: To review the frequency, nature and impact of expert psychiatric and psychological evidence in the Supreme Court in Iceland over a 7-year period where all appeals in Iceland are heard. METHOD: All cases listed on the Supreme Court's Website between 2001 and 2007 were identified. The judgements were carefully screened for relevant information. Details of the nature of the criminal offences for the sample were obtained from official records. RESULTS: 3367 cases were identified. Psychiatric and psychological evidence was considered in 213 (6.3%) cases (2.7% and 4.2% for the two disciplines, respectively), with only 10% cases involving reports from both disciplines. Psychiatrists focused primarily on assessing violent offenders, diminished responsibility issues, restraining orders, and mental state examinations and diagnosis, whereas psychologists were more commonly involved in custody disputes and credibility assessments of victims of sexual offending. No oral expert evidence was heard in the Supreme Court. Psychiatric and psychological evidence was typically that previously presented in the District Courts. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first comprehensive study to investigate the contribution of forensic psychiatry and psychology in appeal cases. Psychiatrists and psychologists have complementary skills for the assessment of court referrals. Their evidence and recommendations in appeal cases in Iceland are accepted by the Supreme Court in the great majority (78%) of cases.Description
To access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links fieldAdditional Links
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08039481003624181ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3109/08039481003624181
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Forensic psychology in Iceland: a survey of members of the Icelandic Psychological Society.
- Authors: Sigurdsson JF, Gudjonsson GH
- Issue date: 2004 Sep
- Psychiatric court reports in Iceland 1970-1982.
- Authors: Gudjonsson GH, Petursson H
- Issue date: 1984 Jul
- [Forensic psychiatry in Norway. A review of the period 1980-93].
- Authors: Noreik K, Grünfeld B
- Issue date: 1996 Mar 20
- Forensic aspects of juvenile violence.
- Authors: Haller LH
- Issue date: 2000 Oct
- From impartial expert to adversary in the wake of Ake.
- Authors: Rachlin S
- Issue date: 1988