A comparison of cytogenetic studies and flow cytometry in breast carcinomas
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
CitationCytometry. 1997, 28(4):323-8
AbstractIn this study, we compared genetic instability in 70 breast carcinomas analyzed by two different methods, cytogenetics and flow cytometry. This comparison showed that each method has its strengths and weaknesses. Flow cytometry detected aneuploidy in 60% of cases, but missed most of the cytogenetically near-diploid clones and clones with simple chromosomal changes. Cytogenetics revealed chromosomal abnormalities in 50% of the samples. Simple chromosomal changes and multiploidy were readily detected by this method, but some of the clones with a high DNA index by flow cytometry were missed. The two methods gave corresponding results in the majority of cases (54%). In 17 cases, both methods detected matching abnormal clones (r = 0.93) but the DNA index was higher than predicted by the chromosome numbers. Most of the discrepancies might be explained by tumor heterogeneity and insufficient numbers of cells available for cytogenetic analyses. In seven cases, single-cell abnormalities were found that corresponded to a flow cytometry peak. Multiclonality was present in 25% of aneuploid tumors. No association was found between metaphases in cytogenetic preparations and increased S-phase fraction of the tumors, but aneuploid tumors had a significantly higher proliferation rate. Pooling data from both methods demonstrated that the majority of our samples were aneuploid (74%).
DescriptionTo access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field
- Comparison between flow cytometric and cytogenetic tumor cell DNA content using a simple flow sample preparation method: ploidy comparison of 86 fresh pediatric tumors.
- Authors: Zwick D, Morgan R, Pasztor L, Harris D, Hetherington M, Zalles C, Garola R
- Issue date: 1995 Nov-Dec
- Correlation of model chromosome number of cultured non-small cell lung carcinomas with DNA index of solid tumor tissue.
- Authors: Siegfried JM, Ellison DJ, Resau JH, Miura I, Testa JR
- Issue date: 1991 Jun 15
- Discrepancies between flow cytometric and cytogenetic studies in the detection of aneuploidy in human solid tumors.
- Authors: Shackney SE, Burholt DR, Pollice AA, Smith CA, Pugh RP, Hartsock RJ
- Issue date: 1990
- Comparison of cytogenetics, interphase cytogenetics, and DNA flow cytometry in bone tumors.
- Authors: Tarkkanen M, Nordling S, Böhling T, Kivioja A, Karaharju E Szymanska J, Elomaa I, Knuutila S
- Issue date: 1996 Sep 15
- Detection of ploidy in colorectal tumors. A comparison between flow cytometry and cytogenetics.
- Authors: Laquerriere A, Peulve P, Scotte MA, Ma SX, Paresy M, Teniere P, Hemet J
- Issue date: 1993 Oct