Human papillomavirus (HPV) in an Icelandic population: the role of HPV DNA testing based on hybrid capture and PCR assays among women with screen-detected abnormal Pap smears
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
CitationInt. J. Cancer. 1997, 72(3):446-52
AbstractThis study was based on 358 cases with abnormal smears referred for colposcopy and HPV DNA testing. We analysed: 1) the frequency of different grades of cyto- and histopathologic findings; 2) the frequency and relative amount of HPV DNA with the hybrid capture assay (HCA) in swabs, and the frequency of HPV with PCR in swabs (-S) and biopsies (-B); and 3) the frequency of HPV types according to the grade of the cyto- and histopathologic findings. Of all cases, 95% were positive with all HPV tests combined. The HCA (HPV: 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, 51, 52 and 56) and the PCR-S and PCR-B (HPV: 16, 18, 31, 33 and 35) tests for high-risk HPV exhibited sensitivities of 57%, 56% and 48%, respectively. The high-grade smears and the high-risk PCR-S HPV had about 80% sensitivity for histologic high-grade lesions compared with around 70% for HCA and the PCR-B. Combining the high-grade smears and the high-risk HPV increased the sensitivity to 93-96%. Among the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I (CIN I) and the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) smears the sensitivity of high-risk HPV for high-grade histologic lesions was 63% for the HCA and 79% for the PCR-S. No correlation was found between the relative amount of HPV DNA detected by HCA and the grade of cyto- and histological lesions. We conclude that the results strongly indicate that HCA is less sensitive than PCR in the diagnosis of high-risk HPV, that swabs are more sensitive than biopsies as a sampling method, that high-risk HPV and high-grade smears are complementary for the diagnosis of high-grade histologic lesions and that the present role of HPV testing in screening could be limited to identifying women with low-grade smears and koilocytotic or low-grade colposcopic biopsies that are at risk of concealing or developing high-grade histologic lesions.
DescriptionTo access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field
- Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral.
- Authors: Kulasingam SL, Hughes JP, Kiviat NB, Mao C, Weiss NS, Kuypers JM, Koutsky LA
- Issue date: 2002 Oct 9
- Managing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Papanicolaou smears.
- Authors: Morin C, Bairati I, Bouchard C, Fortier M, Roy M, Moore L, Meisels A
- Issue date: 2001 Sep
- Comparison of human papillomavirus DNA testing and repeat Papanicolaou test in women with low-grade cervical cytologic abnormalities: a randomized trial. HPV Effectiveness in Lowgrade Paps (HELP) Study No. 1 Group.
- Authors: Lytwyn A, Sellors JW, Mahony JB, Daya D, Chapman W, Ellis N, Roth P, Lorincz AT, Gafni A
- Issue date: 2000 Sep 19
- The clinical value of digene hybrid capture HPV DNA testing in a referral-based population with abnormal pap smears.
- Authors: Recio FO, Sahai Srivastava BI, Wong C, Hempling RE, Eltabbakh GH, Piver MS
- Issue date: 1998
- Triage of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance with hybrid capture II: colposcopy and histologic human papillomavirus correlation.
- Authors: Lonky NM, Felix JC, Naidu YM, Wolde-Tsadik G
- Issue date: 2003 Mar