Effects of knowledge, education, and experience on acceptance of first trimester screening for chromosomal anomalies.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Jonsson, Jon Johannes
MetadataShow full item record
CitationActa Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010, 89(7):931-8
ÚtdrátturOBJECTIVES: To assess pregnant women's knowledge and understanding of first trimester prenatal screening (nuchal translucency, maternal serum free beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin and pregnancy-associated plasma-protein-A), to evaluate the impact of a new information booklet and investigate the effects of education and experiential knowledge of congenital disabilities on the perceived likelihood of accepting prenatal screening. DESIGN: A quasi-experimental quantitative study with a self-completion questionnaire. SETTING: Five different maternity care clinics in Iceland. POPULATION: Expectant mothers in first trimester of pregnancy (n = 379). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Expectant mothers were divided into two groups, an intervention and a control group, both receiving traditional care and information. The intervention group additionally received an information booklet about prenatal screening and diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Women's knowledge score of prenatal screening. The correlation between education, knowledge score, experiential knowledge of congenital disabilities, and the likelihood of accepting prenatal screening. RESULTS: More than half of the women (57%) believed they received sufficient information to make an informed decision about screening. Knowledge scores were significantly higher for the intervention group (with mean 4.8 compared with 3.7 on a 0-8 scale, p < 0.0001). Those with higher scores were more likely to accept screening (p < 0.0001). Women with experiential knowledge of congenital anomalies in their own families were more likely to accept prenatal screening (p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Various factors, e.g. experiential knowledge, education and information about prenatal screening affect the likelihood of participation in prenatal screening programs. More information results in better knowledge and higher uptake rate.
Lu00FDsingTo access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field
- 'This is just what you do when you are pregnant': a qualitative study of prospective parents in Iceland who accept nuchal translucency screening.
- Authors: Gottfredsdóttir H, Sandall J, Björnsdóttir K
- Issue date: 2009 Dec
- The impact of correcting for smoking status when screening for chromosomal anomalies using maternal serum biochemistry and fetal nuchal translucency thickness in the first trimester of pregnancy.
- Authors: Spencer K, Bindra R, Cacho AM, Nicolaides KH
- Issue date: 2004 Mar
- Factors affecting women's preference for type of prenatal screening test for chromosomal anomalies.
- Authors: Spencer K, Aitken D
- Issue date: 2004 Dec
- First-trimester Down syndrome screening: pregnant women's knowledge.
- Authors: Dahl K, Hvidman L, Jørgensen FS, Henriques C, Olesen F, Kjaergaard H, Kesmodel US
- Issue date: 2011 Aug
- First-trimester screening for trisomy 21 by free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A: impact of maternal and pregnancy characteristics.
- Authors: Kagan KO, Wright D, Spencer K, Molina FS, Nicolaides KH
- Issue date: 2008 May