• English
    • íslenska
  • íslenska 
    • English
    • íslenska
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Forsíða
  • Journal Articles, Peer Reviewed (Ritrýndar vísindagreinar)
  • English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)
  • View Item
  •   Forsíða
  • Journal Articles, Peer Reviewed (Ritrýndar vísindagreinar)
  • English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of HirslaCommunitiesHöfundiTitliEfniEfnisorði (MeSH)ÚtgáfudegiTímaritiThis CollectionHöfundiTitliEfniEfnisorði (MeSH)ÚtgáfudegiTímariti

My Account

LoginRegister

Local Links

FAQ - (Icelandic)FAQ - (English)Hirsla LogosAbout LandspitaliLSH Home PageLibrary HomeIcelandic Journals

Statistics

Display statistics

Efforts to establish the reliability of the Resident Assessment Instrument

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Average rating
 
   votes
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
 
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Sgadari, A
Morris, J N
Fries, B E
Ljunggren, G
Jonsson, P V
DuPaquier, J N
Schroll, M
Útgáfudagur
1997-09

Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
Age Ageing. 1997, 26 Suppl 2:27-30
Útdráttur
BACKGROUND: since its original implementation in the USA, the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) has been used in many countries in languages other than English. This paper describes the efforts that have been made to test the inter-rater reliability of the core set of items forming the minimum data set items in the USA and in non-English speaking countries (Denmark, Iceland, Italy, Japan, Sweden and Switzerland). RESULTS: a large proportion (from 70 to 96%) of the items in the RAI achieved an adequate to excellent level of reliability, with no substantial differences across countries. The RAI met the standard for good reliability (i.e. a kappa value of 0.6 or higher) in crucial areas of functional status, such as memory, activities of daily living self-performance and support, and bowel and bladder continence in most of the countries. Indicators of mood and behavioural problems achieved adequate reliability levels of 0.4 or higher.
Lu00FDsing
To access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field
Vefslóð
http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/content/26/suppl_2/27.abstract
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1093/ageing/26.suppl_2.27
Scopus Count
Collections
English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)

entitlement

Related articles

  • Development of the nursing home Resident Assessment Instrument in the USA.
  • Authors: Hawes C, Morris JN, Phillips CD, Fries BE, Murphy K, Mor V
  • Issue date: 1997 Sep
  • A commitment to change: revision of HCFA's RAI.
  • Authors: Morris JN, Nonemaker S, Murphy K, Hawes C, Fries BE, Mor V, Phillips C
  • Issue date: 1997 Aug
  • [Interrater reliability and agreement of the Swiss MDS version 2.0].
  • Authors: Gattinger H, Ott S, Saxer S
  • Issue date: 2014 Feb
  • An international study of social engagement among nursing home residents.
  • Authors: Schroll M, Jónsson PV, Mor V, Berg K, Sherwood S
  • Issue date: 1997 Sep
  • Variation in training programmes for Resident Assessment Instrument implementation.
  • Authors: Bernabei R, Murphy K, Frijters D, DuPaquier JN, Gardent H
  • Issue date: 1997 Sep

DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.