Inaccuracy in self-report of fractures may underestimate association with health outcomes when compared with medical record based fracture registry.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Launer, Lenore J
Harris, Tamara B
Jonsson, Brynjolfur Y
MetadataShow full item record
CitationEur. J. Epidemiol. 2007, 22(9):631-9
ÚtdrátturIntroduction and objective Misreporting fractures in questionnaires is known. However, the effect of misreporting on the association of fractures with subsequent health outcomes has not been examined. Methods Data from a fracture registry (FR) developed from an extensive review of radiographic and medical records were related to self-report of fracture for 2,255 participants from the AGES Reykjavik Study. This data was used to determine false negative and false positive rates of self-reported fractures, correlates of misreporting, and the potential effect of the misreporting on estimates of health outcomes following fractures. Results In women, the false positive rate decreased with age as the false negative rate increased with no clear trend with age in men. Kappa values for agreement between FR and self-report were generally higher in women than men with the best agreement for forearm fracture (men 0.64 and women 0.82) and the least for rib (men 0.28 and women 0.25). Impaired cognition was a major factor associated with discordant answers between FR and self-report, OR 1.7 (95% CI: 1.3-2.1) (P < 0.0001). We estimated the effect of misreporting on health after fracture by comparison of the association of the self-report of fracture and fracture from the FR, adjusting for those factors associated with discordance. The weighted attenuation factor measured by mobility and muscle strength was 11% (95% CI: 0-24%) when adjusted for age and sex but reduced to 6% (95% CI: -10-22%) when adjusted for cognitive impairment. Conclusion Studies of hip fractures should include an independent ascertainment of fracture but for other fractures this study supports the use of self-report.
Lu00FDsingTo access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Link field
- The validity of self-reported fractures among Danish female nurses: comparison with fractures registered in the Danish National Hospital Register.
- Authors: Hundrup YA, Høidrup S, Obel EB, Rasmussen NK
- Issue date: 2004
- Epidemiology of fractures in Iceland and secular trends in major osteoporotic fractures 1989-2008.
- Authors: Siggeirsdottir K, Aspelund T, Jonsson BY, Mogensen B, Gudmundsson EF, Gudnason V, Sigurdsson G
- Issue date: 2014 Jan
- The Tromsø study: registration of fractures, how good are self-reports, a computerized radiographic register and a discharge register?
- Authors: Joakimsen RM, Fønnebø V, Søgaard AJ, Tollan A, Størmer J, Magnus JH
- Issue date: 2001 Dec
- Self-reported diseases and the risk of non-vertebral fractures: the Tromsø study.
- Authors: Ahmed LA, Schirmer H, Berntsen GK, Fønnebø V, Joakimsen RM
- Issue date: 2006 Jan
- Validity of self-report for fractures among a multiethnic cohort of postmenopausal women: results from the Women's Health Initiative observational study and clinical trials.
- Authors: Chen Z, Kooperberg C, Pettinger MB, Bassford T, Cauley JA, LaCroix AZ, Lewis CE, Kipersztok S, Borne C, Jackson RD
- Issue date: 2004 May-Jun