• English
    • íslenska
  • íslenska 
    • English
    • íslenska
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Forsíða
  • Journal Articles, Peer Reviewed (Ritrýndar vísindagreinar)
  • English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)
  • View Item
  •   Forsíða
  • Journal Articles, Peer Reviewed (Ritrýndar vísindagreinar)
  • English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of HirslaCommunitiesHöfundiTitliEfniEfnisorði (MeSH)ÚtgáfudegiTímaritiThis CollectionHöfundiTitliEfniEfnisorði (MeSH)ÚtgáfudegiTímariti

My Account

LoginRegister

Local Links

FAQ - (Icelandic)FAQ - (English)Hirsla LogosAbout LandspitaliLSH Home PageLibrary HomeIcelandic Journals

Statistics

Display statistics

Rasch analysis of the ADL scale of the A-ONE

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Average rating
 
   votes
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
 
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Arnadottir, Gudrun
Fisher, Anne G
Útgáfudagur
2008-01-01

Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
Am J Occup Ther 2008, 62(1):51-60
Útdráttur
The ADL-focused Occupation-based Neurobehavioral Evaluation (A-ONE; Arnadóttir, 1990) can be used to evaluate both performance of activities of daily living (ADL) tasks and neurobehavioral problems that interfere with ADL task performance among clients with neurological disorders. This study examined the rating scale structure and aspects of validity and reliability of the A-ONE's ordinal ADL scale by applying Rasch analysis methods (Bond & Fox, 2001). Rasch analysis of 209 clients' A-ONE assessments indicated that misfit of items to the ADL scale could be reduced by removing the two communication items. Threshold disordering could be corrected by combining two adjacent scoring categories (supervision and verbal assistance), thus supporting four response categories. Separation reliability for item calibrations (.98) was high and acceptable for people (.90). Finally, principal components analysis of the residuals supported unidimensionality. The study provided support for converting the ordinal ADL scale to an interval scale that has potential to be used to measure changes in ADL task performance over time.
Lu00FDsing
To access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field
Vefslóð
http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1412588381&Fmt=3&clientId=58120&RQT=309&VName=PQD
Collections
English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)

entitlement

Related articles

  • Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the ADL-focused Occupation-based Neurobehavioural Evaluation (A-ONE J): Applying Rasch analysis methods.
  • Authors: Higashi Y, Takabatake S, Matsubara A, Nishikawa K, Shigeta H, Árnadóttir G
  • Issue date: 2019 Jun
  • Dimensionality of nonmotor neurobehavioral impairments when observed in the natural contexts of ADL task performance.
  • Authors: Arnadóttir G, Fisher AG, Löfgren B
  • Issue date: 2009 Jul-Aug
  • Developing linear ADL ability measures based on the ADL Taxonomy: a Rasch analysis.
  • Authors: Waehrens EE, Fisher AG
  • Issue date: 2009 Sep
  • Validity of the Arnadóttir OT-ADL Neurobehavioral Evaluation (A-ONE): performance in activities of daily living and neurobehavioral impairments of persons with left and right hemisphere damage.
  • Authors: Gardarsdóttir S, Kaplan S
  • Issue date: 2002 Sep-Oct
  • Application of Rasch analysis to examine psychometric aspects of the activities-specific balance confidence scale when used in a new cultural context.
  • Authors: Arnadottir SA, Lundin-Olsson L, Gunnarsdottir ED, Fisher AG
  • Issue date: 2010 Jan

DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.