Severe sepsis and septic shock: a prospective population-based study in Icelandic intensive care units.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
CitationActa Anaesthesiol Scand 2011, 55(6):722-31
AbstractBACKGROUND: The aims of our study were to describe the nationwide epidemiology of sepsis requiring intensive care during an entire year and to evaluate compliance with treatment guidelines. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study of all adult patients admitted to Icelandic intensive care units (ICUs), who were screened for the ACCP/SCCM criteria for severe sepsis or septic shock on admission. Data were collected from 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2009. RESULTS: One thousand five hundred and twenty-four patients were admitted to the ICUs during the study year, 115 of them because of severe sepsis or septic shock. The incidence in Iceland was 0.48/1000 inhabitants ≥18 years per year [95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.42-0.55]. The mean APACHE II score was 20.7. Mortality was 24.6% (95% CI 17.5-33.3) at 28 days and 40.4% (95% CI 31.8-49.5) at 1 year. The main sources of infections were pulmonary (37%), abdominal (28%) and urinary tract (8%). Pathogens were gram-positive (39%), gram-negative (30%) and mixed (28%). No patient had sepsis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or a monomicrobial fungal infection. Pulmonary infections were an independent predictor of death. Compliance to the resuscitation goals of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign ranged from 60% to 72% and the 6-hour Sepsis Bundle was completed in 35% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study showed an incidence of 0.48/1000 inhabitants for severe sepsis and septic shock requiring intensive care therapy. The 28-day mortality rate of 25 % was in the lower range of previous reports but the compliance to resuscitation goals and sepsis bundles was similar.
DescriptionTo access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field.
RightsArchived with thanks to Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
- The outcome of patients with sepsis and septic shock presenting to emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand.
- Authors: ARISE., ANZICS APD Management Committee.
- Issue date: 2007 Mar
- Sepsis incidence and outcome: contrasting the intensive care unit with the hospital ward.
- Authors: Esteban A, Frutos-Vivar F, Ferguson ND, Peñuelas O, Lorente JA, Gordo F, Honrubia T, Algora A, Bustos A, García G, Diaz-Regañón IR, de Luna RR
- Issue date: 2007 May
- Brazilian Sepsis Epidemiological Study (BASES study).
- Authors: Silva E, Pedro Mde A, Sogayar AC, Mohovic T, Silva CL, Janiszewski M, Cal RG, de Sousa EF, Abe TP, de Andrade J, de Matos JD, Rezende E, Assunção M, Avezum A, Rocha PC, de Matos GF, Bento AM, Corrêa AD, Vieira PC, Knobel E, Brazilian Sepsis Epidemiological Study.
- Issue date: 2004 Aug
- Survival analysis of 314 episodes of sepsis in medical intensive care unit in university hospital: impact of intensive care unit performance and antimicrobial therapy.
- Authors: Degoricija V, Sharma M, Legac A, Gradiser M, Sefer S, Vucicević Z
- Issue date: 2006 Jun
- Epidemiology of severe sepsis in intensive care units in the Slovak Republic.
- Authors: Záhorec R, Firment J, Straková J, Mikula J, Malík P, Novák I, Zeman J, Chlebo P
- Issue date: 2005 Jun