• English
    • íslenska
  • English 
    • English
    • íslenska
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Journal Articles, Peer Reviewed (Ritrýndar vísindagreinar)
  • English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Journal Articles, Peer Reviewed (Ritrýndar vísindagreinar)
  • English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of HirslaCommunitiesAuthorsTitleSubjectsSubject (MeSH)Issue DateJournalThis CollectionAuthorsTitleSubjectsSubject (MeSH)Issue DateJournal

My Account

LoginRegister

Local Links

FAQ - (Icelandic)FAQ - (English)Hirsla LogosAbout LandspitaliLSH Home PageLibrary HomeIcelandic Journals

Statistics

Display statistics

Method for Assigning Priority Levels in Acute Care (MAPLe-AC) predicts outcomes of acute hospital care of older persons--a cross-national validation.

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Average rating
 
   votes
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
 
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Noro, Anja
Poss, Jeffrey W
Hirdes, John P
Finne-Soveri, Harriet
Ljunggren, Gunnar
Björnsson, Jan
Schroll, Marianne
Jonsson, Palmi V
Issue Date
2011

Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
BMC. Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2011, 11:39
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although numerous risk factors for adverse outcomes for older persons after an acute hospital stay have been : identified, a decision making tool combining all available information in a clinically meaningful way would be helpful for daily hospital practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of the Method for Assigning Priority Levels for Acute Care (MAPLe-AC) to predict adverse outcomes in acute care for older people and to assess its usability as a decision making tool for discharge planning. METHODS: Data from a prospective multicenter study in five Nordic acute care hospitals with information from admission to a one year follow-up of older acute care patients were compared with a prospective study of acute care patients from admission to discharge in eight hospitals in Canada. The interRAI Acute Care assessment instrument (v1.1) was used for data collection. Data were collected during the first 24 hours in hospital, including pre-morbid and admission information, and at day 7 or at discharge, whichever came first. Based on this information a crosswalk was developed from the original MAPLe algorithm for home care settings to acute care (MAPLe-AC). The sample included persons 75 years or older who were admitted to acute internal medical services in one hospital in each of the five Nordic countries (n = 763) or to acute hospital care either internal medical or combined medical-surgical services in eight hospitals in Ontario, Canada (n = 393). The outcome measures considered were discharge to home, discharge to institution or death. Outcomes in a 1-year follow-up in the Nordic hospitals were: living at home, living in an institution or death, and survival. Logistic regression with ROC curves and Cox regression analyses were used in the analyses. RESULTS: Low and mild priority levels of MAPLe-AC predicted discharge home and high and very high priority levels predicted adverse outcome at discharge both in the Nordic and Canadian data sets, and one-year outcomes in the Nordic data set. The predictive accuracy (AUC's) of MAPLe-AC's was higher for discharge outcome than one year outcome, and for discharge home in Canadian hospitals but for adverse outcome in Nordic hospitals. High and very high priority levels in MAPLe-AC were also predictive of days to death adjusted for diagnoses in survival models. CONCLUSION: MAPLe-AC is a valid algorithm based on risk factors that predict outcomes of acute hospital care. It could be a helpful tool for early discharge planning although further testing for active use in clinical practice is still needed.
Description
To access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field.
Additional Links
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-11-39
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3127743/?tool=pubmed
Rights
Archived with thanks to BMC medical informatics and decision making
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1186/1472-6947-11-39
Scopus Count
Collections
English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)

entitlement

Related articles

  • Admission profile is predictive of outcome in acute hospital care.
  • Authors: Jónsson PV, Noro A, Finne-Soveri H, Jensdóttir AB, Ljunggren G, Bucht G, Grue EV, Björnson J, Jonsén E, Schroll M
  • Issue date: 2008 Dec
  • A randomised controlled trial to prevent hospital readmissions and loss of functional ability in high risk older adults: a study protocol.
  • Authors: Courtney MD, Edwards HE, Chang AM, Parker AW, Finlayson K, Hamilton K
  • Issue date: 2011 Aug 23
  • Optimizing triage and hospitalization in adult general medical emergency patients: the triage project.
  • Authors: Schuetz P, Hausfater P, Amin D, Haubitz S, Fässler L, Grolimund E, Kutz A, Schild U, Caldara Z, Regez K, Zhydkov A, Kahles T, Nedeltchev K, von Felten S, De Geest S, Conca A, Schäfer-Keller P, Huber A, Bargetzi M, Buergi U, Sauvin G, Perrig-Chiello P, Reutlinger B, Mueller B
  • Issue date: 2013 Jul 4
  • Development of quality indicators for monitoring outcomes of frail elderly hospitalised in acute care health settings: study protocol.
  • Authors: Brand CA, Martin-Khan M, Wright O, Jones RN, Morris JN, Travers CM, Tropea J, Gray LC
  • Issue date: 2011 Oct 20
  • Acute care inpatients with long-term delayed-discharge: evidence from a Canadian health region.
  • Authors: Costa AP, Poss JW, Peirce T, Hirdes JP
  • Issue date: 2012 Jun 22

DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.