Body configuration as a predictor of mortality: comparison of five anthropometric measures in a 12 year follow-up of the Norwegian HUNT 2 study.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
CitationPLoS ONE 2011, 6(10):e26621
AbstractBACKGROUND: Distribution of body fat is more important than the amount of fat as a prognostic factor for life expectancy. Despite that, body mass index (BMI) still holds its status as the most used indicator of obesity in clinical work. METHODS: We assessed the association of five different anthropometric measures with mortality in general and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in particular using Cox proportional hazards models. Predictive properties were compared by computing integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification improvement for two different prediction models. The measures studied were BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR). The study population was a prospective cohort of 62,223 Norwegians, age 20-79, followed up for mortality from 1995-1997 to the end of 2008 (mean follow-up 12.0 years) in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT 2). RESULTS: After adjusting for age, smoking and physical activity WHR and WHtR were found to be the strongest predictors of death. Hazard ratios (HRs) for CVD mortality per increase in WHR of one standard deviation were 1.23 for men and 1.27 for women. For WHtR, these HRs were 1.24 for men and 1.23 for women. WHR offered the greatest integrated discrimination improvement to the prediction models studied, followed by WHtR and waist circumference. Hip circumference was in strong inverse association with mortality when adjusting for waist circumference. In all analyses, BMI had weaker association with mortality than three of the other four measures studied. CONCLUSIONS: Our study adds further knowledge to the evidence that BMI is not the most appropriate measure of obesity in everyday clinical practice. WHR can reliably be measured and is as easy to calculate as BMI and is currently better documented than WHtR. It appears reasonable to recommend WHR as the primary measure of body composition and obesity.
DescriptionTo access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field.
RightsArchived with thanks to PloS one
- Comparison of overall obesity and body fat distribution in predicting risk of mortality.
- Authors: Reis JP, Macera CA, Araneta MR, Lindsay SP, Marshall SJ, Wingard DL
- Issue date: 2009 Jun
- Comparison of various surrogate obesity indicators as predictors of cardiovascular mortality in four European populations.
- Authors: Song X, Jousilahti P, Stehouwer CD, Söderberg S, Onat A, Laatikainen T, Yudkin JS, Dankner R, Morris R, Tuomilehto J, Qiao Q
- Issue date: 2013 Dec
- Measures of overweight and obesity and risk of cardiovascular disease: a population-based study.
- Authors: Sehested TS, Hansen TW, Olsen MH, Abildstrøm SZ, Rasmussen S, Ibsen H, Torp-Pedersen C, Madsbad S, Jeppesen J
- Issue date: 2010 Aug
- Waist circumference, waist-hip ratio and body mass index and their correlation with cardiovascular disease risk factors in Australian adults.
- Authors: Dalton M, Cameron AJ, Zimmet PZ, Shaw JE, Jolley D, Dunstan DW, Welborn TA, AusDiab Steering Committee.
- Issue date: 2003 Dec
- New indexes of body fat distribution and sex-specific risk of total and cause-specific mortality: a prospective cohort study.
- Authors: Rost S, Freuer D, Peters A, Thorand B, Holle R, Linseisen J, Meisinger C
- Issue date: 2018 Apr 2