Comparing the effect of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 with balanced crystalloid solution on mortality and kidney failure in patients with severe sepsis (6S--Scandinavian Starch for Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock trial): study protocol, design and rationale for a double-blinded, randomised clinical trial.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Guttormsen, Anne Berit
Bødker, Karen Doris
Bådstøløkken, Per Martin
Madsen, Kristian R
Larsen, Nils H
Petersen, John Asger
Kjældgaard, Anne Lene
Holst, Lars Broksø
MetadataShow full item record
CitationTrials 2011, 12(1):24
ÚtdrátturBACKGROUND: By tradition colloid solutions have been used to obtain fast circulatory stabilisation in shock, but high molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch (HES) may cause acute kidney failure in patients with severe sepsis. Now lower molecular weight HES 130/0.4 is the preferred colloid in Scandinavian intensive care units (ICUs) and 1st choice fluid for patients with severe sepsis. However, HES 130/0.4 is largely unstudied in patients with severe sepsis. METHODS/DESIGN: The 6S trial will randomize 800 patients with severe sepsis in 30 Scandinavian ICUs to masked fluid resuscitation using either 6% HES 130/0.4 in Ringer's acetate or Ringer's acetate alone. The composite endpoint of 90-day mortality or end-stage kidney failure is the primary outcome measure. The secondary outcome measures are severe bleeding or allergic reactions, organ failure, acute kidney failure, days alive without renal replacement therapy or ventilator support and 28-day and 1/2- and one-year mortality. The sample size will allow the detection of a 10% absolute difference between the two groups in the composite endpoint with a power of 80%. DISCUSSION: The 6S trial will provide important safety and efficacy data on the use of HES 130/0.4 in patients with severe sepsis. The effects on mortality, dialysis-dependency, time on ventilator, bleeding and markers of resuscitation, metabolism, kidney failure, and coagulation will be assessed.
Lu00FDsingTo access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field.
RightsArchived with thanks to Trials
- Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer's acetate in severe sepsis.
- Authors: Perner A, Haase N, Guttormsen AB, Tenhunen J, Klemenzson G, Åneman A, Madsen KR, Møller MH, Elkjær JM, Poulsen LM, Bendtsen A, Winding R, Steensen M, Berezowicz P, Søe-Jensen P, Bestle M, Strand K, Wiis J, White JO, Thornberg KJ, Quist L, Nielsen J, Andersen LH, Holst LB, Thormar K, Kjældgaard AL, Fabritius ML, Mondrup F, Pott FC, Møller TP, Winkel P, Wetterslev J, 6S Trial Group., Scandinavian Critical Care Trials Group.
- Issue date: 2012 Jul 12
- Hydroxyethyl starch in sepsis.
- Authors: Haase NR
- Issue date: 2014 Jan
- Acute kidney injury with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 in severe sepsis.
- Authors: Müller RB, Haase N, Lange T, Wetterslev J, Perner A
- Issue date: 2015 Mar
- Hydroxyethyl starch in severe sepsis: end of starch era?
- Authors: Estrada CA, Murugan R
- Issue date: 2013 Mar 13
- Long-term outcomes in patients with severe sepsis randomised to resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 or Ringer's acetate.
- Authors: Perner A, Haase N, Winkel P, Guttormsen AB, Tenhunen J, Klemenzson G, Müller RG, Aneman A, Wetterslev J
- Issue date: 2014 Jul