The use of digital photographs for the diagnosis of hand osteoarthritis: the AGES-Reykjavik study.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Helgadottir, Gudrun P
Sverrisdottir, Johanna E
Eliasson, Gudmundur J
Harris, Tamara B
MetadataShow full item record
CitationBMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2012, 13:20 BMC Musculoskelet Disord
AbstractThe objective of the study was to standardize a method using digital photographs to diagnose and grade hand osteoarthritis (HOA), to compare it with radiographs and clinical examination with regard to prevalence and relation to symptoms, and finally to construct a simple shortened version suitable for use in very large studies, where a global estimate may be preferable. High quality photographs with standard distance and hand positioning were analysed for the presence of HOA and subsequently compared with standard radiographs and clinical examination in 381 random participants in the AGES-Reykjavik Study, a large population study. The mean age of the participants was 76 years. Using the photographic method, the most commonly affected joints were the second DIP joints followed by the third DIP joints and second and third PIP joints. Both interobserver (ICC = 0.83) and intraobserver reading agreements (ICC = 0.89) were acceptable. On comparison with radiography and clinical examination, aggregate scores were significantly correlated (R(s) 0.35-0.69), more so in females (R(s) 0.53-0.72) than males. Hand pain in males showed very little association with HOA findings by the three methods but all methods showed a comparable moderate association with hand pain in females. The performance of photography in predicting pain on most days for at least a month in females was comparable to that of radiography and clinical examination (AUC 0.63 p = 0.004). Analysis of intermittent pain yielded similar results for in the DIP and PIP joints (OR 3.2-3.3, p < 0.01), but for the CMC1 joints, both radiography (OR 9.0, p < 0.0001), and clinical examination (OR 9.8, p < 0.0001), had higher predictive odds ratios for pain than photography (OR 3.6, p < 0.0001)., A shortened, rapidly performed form of reading photographs also showed a high degree of correlation with the other methods (R(s) 0.56-0.82). High quality hand photographs can be used to diagnose and grade hand osteoarthritis. The method has the advantage of being inexpensive and easy to perform. By using a slightly simplified method of reading, it appears to be highly suitable for use in large studies.
DescriptionTo access full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink "View/open" at the bottom of this page
RightsArchived with thanks to BMC musculoskeletal disorders
- Age related prevalence of hand osteoarthritis diagnosed by photography (HOASCORE).
- Authors: Jonsson H
- Issue date: 2017 Dec 2
- Reliability of Assessing Hand Osteoarthritis on Digital Photographs and Associations With Radiographic and Clinical Findings.
- Authors: Marshall M, Jonsson H, Helgadottir GP, Nicholls E, van der Windt D, Myers H, Dziedzic K
- Issue date: 2014 Jun
- Longitudinal validity of using digital hand photographs for assessing hand osteoarthritis progression over 7 years in community-dwelling older adults with hand pain.
- Authors: Marshall M, Jonsson H, Helgadottir GP, Nicholls E, Myers H, Jansen V, van der Windt D
- Issue date: 2019 Oct 27
- Utility of digital photographs of the hand for assessing the presence of hand osteoarthritis.
- Authors: Stern AG, Moxley G, Sudha Rao TP, Disler D, McDowell C, Park M, Schumacher HR
- Issue date: 2004 May
- Idiopathic hand osteoarthritis vs haemochromatosis arthropathy--a clinical, functional and radiographic study.
- Authors: Dallos T, Sahinbegovic E, Stamm T, Aigner E, Axmann R, Stadlmayr A, Englbrecht M, Datz C, Schett G, Zwerina J
- Issue date: 2013 May