Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Einarsson, Gudmundur V
MetadataShow full item record
CitationEur. Urol. 2005, 48(4):593-600
ÚtdrátturOBJECTS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of the current WHO histological subtyping and Fuhrman nuclear grading on the survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective population-based study was carried out on all patients with a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of RCC in Iceland between 1971 and 2000. Fuhrman grade, TNM stage, and survival were evaluated and multivariate analysis applied in order to determine prognostic factors. RESULTS: Out of 629 patients (387 males, 242 females, mean age 64 years), 558 (88.7%) had clear cell, 53 (8.4%) papillary, and 13 (2.1%) chromophobe RCC. Patient demographics were comparable for the two major subtypes, but chromophobe RCCs were larger in size and were diagnosed at a younger age. Clear cell RCCs were more often of higher grades (G3+G4, 48.4%) and at advanced TNM stages (III+IV, 59.3%) than papillary RCCs (22.6% and 34% respectively, p<0.001). Linear regression analysis showed a strong correlation between grade, tumor size, and stage (p<0.001). Chromophobe RCCs had a better survival in univariate analysis than both papillary and clear cell RCCs (84.6% vs. 66.5% and 54.9% 5-year disease specific survival, p<0.001). However, in the multivariate analysis, only the patient's age, calendar year of diagnosis, TNM stage, and nuclear grade were independent prognostic factors of survival. CONCLUSION: In this complete nation-wide series nuclear grading is important in predicting survival of patients with RCC. It is strongly related to both tumor size and stage, with stage being by far the strongest prognostic factor. Different histological subtypes confer different survival. However, in spite of the distinctive cytogenetic and molecular characteristics of the subtypes, the survival difference is to a large extent due to differences in grade and particularly stage.
Lu00FDsingTo access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field
- Prognostic value of renal vein and inferior vena cava involvement in renal cell carcinoma.
- Authors: Wagner B, Patard JJ, Méjean A, Bensalah K, Verhoest G, Zigeuner R, Ficarra V, Tostain J, Mulders P, Chautard D, Descotes JL, de la Taille A, Salomon L, Prayer-Galetti T, Cindolo L, Valéri A, Meyer N, Jacqmin D, Lang H
- Issue date: 2009 Feb
- Long-term survival of patients with unilateral sporadic multifocal renal cell carcinoma according to histologic subtype compared with patients with solitary tumors after radical nephrectomy.
- Authors: Dimarco DS, Lohse CM, Zincke H, Cheville JC, Blute ML
- Issue date: 2004 Sep
- Renal cell carcinoma in young compared to older patients: comparison of clinicopathological risk factors and survival.
- Authors: Thoroddsen A, Einarsson GV, Hardarson S, Petursdottir V, Magnusson J, Jonsson E, Gudbjartsson T
- Issue date: 2008
- Young age is independent prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival of low-stage clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
- Authors: Jung EJ, Lee HJ, Kwak C, Ku JH, Moon KC
- Issue date: 2009 Jan
- Morphological subtyping of papillary renal cell carcinoma: clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis.
- Authors: Yamashita S, Ioritani N, Oikawa K, Aizawa M, Endoh M, Arai Y
- Issue date: 2007 Aug