Negative-pressure wound therapy for deep sternal wound infections reduces the rate of surgical interventions for early re-infections.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
CitationInteract Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012, 15(3):406-10
AbstractTo evaluate the outcome of treatment for deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) in a nationwide patient cohort, before and after the introduction of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT). This was a population-based cohort of all patients treated for DSWI in Iceland out of 2446 open heart operations performed between 2000 and 2010. Length of hospital stay, survival and reoperations were compared in (i) 23 patients treated with open and/or closed irrigation before August 2005 (conventional treatment, CvT group) and in (ii) 20 patients treated after this time with NPWT as a first-line therapy (NPWT group). The DSWI rate was 1.8% and did not change during the study period. Demographics were similar for both groups, except for peripheral arterial disease which was less common in the NPWT group. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were also more common (as the only pathogen identified) in the NPWT group (70% vs 30%, P = 0.01). The median length of hospital stay was 43 days in both groups and the sternum could be closed with delayed primary closure in all except 2 patients, one in each group. Eight patients in the CvT group required surgical revision for re-infections, including debridement and rewiring, when compared with 1 patient in the NPWT group (P = 0.02). Furthermore, 6 patients in the CvT group developed late chronic infections of the sternum requiring surgical revision, compared with one in the NPWT group (P = 0.10). The 30-day mortality was not significantly different between groups (4% vs 0%, P > 0.1) and the same was true for 1-year mortality (17% vs 0%, P = 0.11). NPWT significantly reduces the risk of early re-infections in patients with DSWI. There was a lower rate of late chronic sternal infections and lower mortality in the NPWT group, but the difference was not statistically significant. We conclude that NPWT should be considered as a first-line treatment for most DSWIs.
DescriptionTo access publisher's full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field.
RightsArchived with thanks to Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
- Deep sternal wound infections following open heart surgery in Iceland: a population-based study.
- Authors: Steingrimsson S, Gottfredsson M, Kristinsson KG, Gudbjartsson T
- Issue date: 2008 Jun
- Negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of sternal wound infections after cardiac surgery.
- Authors: Fleck T, Fleck M
- Issue date: 2014 Jun
- First-line treatment of deep sternal infection by a plastic surgical approach: superior results compared with conventional cardiac surgical orthodoxy.
- Authors: Brandt C, Alvarez JM
- Issue date: 2002 Jun
- Changes in the management of deep sternal wound infections: a 12-year review.
- Authors: Lonie S, Hallam J, Yii M, Davis P, Newcomb A, Nixon I, Rosalion A, Ricketts S
- Issue date: 2015 Nov
- Negative pressure wound therapy for post-sternotomy mediastinitis reduces mortality rate and sternal re-infection rate compared to conventional treatment.
- Authors: Petzina R, Hoffmann J, Navasardyan A, Malmsjö M, Stamm C, Unbehaun A, Hetzer R
- Issue date: 2010 Jul