pT4 stage II and III colon cancers carry the worst prognosis in a nationwide survival analysis. Shepherd's local peritoneal involvement revisited.
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Útgáfudagur
2014-07-15
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Int. J. Cancer 2014, 135(2):467-78Útdráttur
The aim of this study is to clarify the prognostic importance of several well-known but still debated pathological variables related to the survival of colon cancer patients. The study focuses on the definition and survival carried by the pT4 category and stage II where the presence of high-risk variables may determine whether or not adjuvant chemotherapy is administered. A retrospective nationwide study was carried out including all colon cancer patients that underwent resection in Iceland between 1990 and 2004 (n = 889). All histopathology was reassessed. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival were analysed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. In stage II, the five-year CSS for pT4 was 50% (95% CI, 32-69%), which was the lowest survival observed in that stage. In stage III the five-year CSS was 30% (95% CI, 18-41%) and 37% (95% CI, 26-48%) for pT4 and pN2 tumors, respectively. Lymphatic invasion and differentiation had no prognostic value in stage II. The survival associated with pT4a versus pT4b depends on how these categories are defined with regard to Shepherd's local peritoneal involvement (LPI). In the present series, pT4 is a major indicator of poor prognosis in patients with stage II and III colon carcinoma. Four-tiered TNM or Dukes staging systems are insufficient by not taking this variable into account. Only Shepherd's LPI4 and a subgroup of LPI3 (i.e., borderline LPI3/LPI4) should qualify for the pT4a subcategory. The results do not support lymphatic invasion or poor differentiation as high-risk stage II variables.Lu00FDsing
To access publisher's full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field.Rights
Archived with thanks to International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancerae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/ijc.28676
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Clinical impact of elastic laminal invasion in colon cancer: elastic laminal invasion-positive stage II colon cancer is a high-risk equivalent to stage III.
- Authors: Yokota M, Kojima M, Nomura S, Nishizawa Y, Kobayashi A, Ito M, Ochiai A, Saito N
- Issue date: 2014 Jul
- Prognostic Impact of pT Stage and Peritoneal Invasion in Locally Advanced Colon Cancer.
- Authors: Baguena G, Pellino G, Frasson M, Roselló S, Cervantes A, García-Granero A, Giner F, García-Granero E
- Issue date: 2019 Jun
- Adjuvant chemotherapy is not associated with improved survival for all high-risk factors in stage II colon cancer.
- Authors: Verhoeff SR, van Erning FN, Lemmens VE, de Wilt JH, Pruijt JF
- Issue date: 2016 Jul 1
- Peritoneal involvement in stage II colon cancer.
- Authors: Lennon AM, Mulcahy HE, Hyland JM, Lowry C, White A, Fennelly D, Murphy JJ, O'Donoghue DP, Sheahan K
- Issue date: 2003 Jan
- Adjuvant chemotherapy use and outcomes of patients with high-risk versus low-risk stage II colon cancer.
- Authors: Kumar A, Kennecke HF, Renouf DJ, Lim HJ, Gill S, Woods R, Speers C, Cheung WY
- Issue date: 2015 Feb 15