Death talk: gender differences in talking about one's own impending death.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
CitationBMC Palliat Care 2014, 13(1):8
AbstractAccording to common practice based on a generally agreed interpretation of Icelandic law on the rights of patients, health care professionals cannot discuss prognosis and treatment with a patient's family without that patient's consent. This limitation poses ethical problems, because research has shown that, in the absence of insight and communication regarding a patient's impending death, patient's significant others may subsequently experience long-term psychological distress. It is also reportedly important for most dying patients to know that health care personnel are comfortable with talking about death and dying. There is only very limited information concerning gender differences regarding death talk in terminal care patients.
This is a retrospective analysis of detailed prospective "field notes" from chaplain interviews of all patients aged 30-75 years receiving palliative care and/or with DNR (do not resuscitate) written on their charts who requested an interview with a hospital chaplain during a period of 3 years. After all study patients had died, these notes were analyzed to assess the prevalence of patient-initiated discussions regarding their own impending death and whether non-provocative evocation-type interventions had facilitated such communication.
During the 3-year study period, 195 interviews (114 men, 81 women) were conducted. According to the field notes, 80% of women and 30% of men initiated death talk within the planned 30-minute interviews. After evoking interventions, 59% (67/114) of men and 91% (74/81) of women engaged in death talk. Even with these interventions, at the end of the first interview gender differences were still statistically significant (p = 0.001). By the end of the second interview gender difference was less, but still statistically significant (p = 0.001).
Gender differences in terminal care communication may be radically reduced by using simple evocation methods that are relatively unpretentious, but require considerable clinical training.Men in terminal care are more reluctant than women to enter into discussion regarding their own impending death in clinical settings. Intervention based on non-provocative evocation methods may increase death talk in both genders, the relative increase being higher for men.
DescriptionTo access publisher's full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field.
RightsArchived with thanks to BMC palliative care
- Using motivational interviewing to facilitate death talk in end-of-life care: an ethical analysis.
- Authors: Black I, Helgason ÁR
- Issue date: 2018 Mar 21
- The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
- Authors: Perrenoud B, Velonaki VS, Bodenmann P, Ramelet AS
- Issue date: 2015 Oct
- Understanding communication among health care professionals regarding death and dying in pediatrics.
- Authors: Harrison J, Evan E, Hughes A, Yazdani S, Federman M, Harrison R
- Issue date: 2014 Oct
- Exploring men's and women's experiences of depression and engagement with health professionals: more similarities than differences? A qualitative interview study.
- Authors: Emslie C, Ridge D, Ziebland S, Hunt K
- Issue date: 2007 Jul 24
- [Existential questions prior to elective surgery. Survey in a preoperative anesthesia consultation service].
- Authors: Meyer-Zehnder B, Bucher E, Vogt DR, Pargger H
- Issue date: 2016 Apr