Accuracy of cytology for diagnosis of lipomatous tumors: comparison with magnetic resonance and computed tomography findings in 175 cases
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
CitationActa Radiol 2004, 45(8):840-6
AbstractPURPOSE: To assess the value of fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnostic work-up of lipomatous tumors of the extremities and trunk, and to identify specific radiological features that could aid in the preoperative evaluation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 175 patients with subfascial lipomatous tumors who had undergone preoperative magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography and fine-needle aspiration cytology were studied. The percentage of fat within the lesion was visually graded from the images as: none, 1-75%, 75-95%, or 95-100%. The histological and cytological diagnoses were compared and in discordant cases the radiological images were re-reviewed. RESULTS: There was cytological and histological concordance in 96% of lipomas and in 85% of atypical lipomatous tumors (ALT) and liposarcomas. Most discordant cases exhibited 1-75% fat. Radiological review suggested that cytological sampling problems due to tumor heterogeneity were the main cause of diagnostic difficulties. The majority of tumors with less than 75% fat were liposarcomas, and in no liposarcoma was the fat content higher than 75%. Both ALT and lipoma were found in the 95-100% group. CONCLUSION: Cytology can be highly accurate in the diagnosis of lipomatous tumors, including ALT; however, critical comparison with the radiological findings increases diagnostic security. In tumors with fat content visually assessed as less than 75% of the tumor volume, liposarcoma is the most likely diagnosis and a cytological diagnosis of ALT or lipoma should be questioned. In lesions with 75-95% fat, liposarcoma is unlikely, but FNAC is still indicated for safety. In lesions with 95-100% fat, FNAC is only indicated if the differentiation between lipoma and ALT influences the treatment strategy.
DescriptionTo access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Link feild
- 110 subfascial lipomatous tumors. MR and CT findings versus histopathological diagnosis and cytogenetic analysis.
- Authors: Einarsdottir H, Söderlund V, Larsson O, Mandahl N, Bauer HC
- Issue date: 1999 Nov
- Differentiating atypical lipomatous tumors from lipomas with magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison with MDM2 gene amplification status.
- Authors: Knebel C, Neumann J, Schwaiger BJ, Karampinos DC, Pfeiffer D, Specht K, Lenze U, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Rummeny EJ, Woertler K, Gersing AS
- Issue date: 2019 Apr 3
- Review of large deep lipomatous tumours.
- Authors: Serpell JW, Chen RY
- Issue date: 2007 Jul
- Computed tomographic evaluation of fatty neoplasms of the extremities. A clinical, radiographic, and histologic review of cases.
- Authors: Wolfe SW, Bansal M, Healey JH, Ghelman B
- Issue date: 1989 Oct
- Lipomatous tumors.
- Authors: Weiss SW
- Issue date: 1996