Quantification of menstrual flow by weighing protective pads in women with normal, decreased or increased menstruation
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
AuthorsGudmundsdottir, Brynja R
Hjaltalin, Elin F
Geirsson, Reynir T
Onundarson, Pall T
MetadataShow full item record
CitationActa Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009, 88(3):275-9
AbstractOBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between menstrual flow weight measured from modern sanitary pads (converting liquid to non-evaporating gel) and clinically assessed normal, increased or decreased menstrual flow. DESIGN: Objective method development study. SETTING: Outpatient clinic, University Hospital, Reykjavik. POPULATION: One hundred and thirteen volunteers included 26 normally menstruating adult women and 52 normally menstruating teenagers not using oral or intrauterine contraception, seven normally menstruating women using oral contraception, 17 women with clinically diagnosed menorrhagia, five women using oral contraception for clinical menorrhagia, and six teenage girls claiming heavy menstrual flow. METHODS: Menstruation length, menstrual flow weight and history of iron deficiency were assessed. During the menstruation following recruitment, all women collected their used protective pads in a hygienic manner and returned them to the laboratory for accurate weighing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Menstrual flow total weight measured in grams. RESULTS: Mean menstrual flow total weight in the 78 asymptomatic women was 51 g (median 44, range 5-144). The mean flow in 17 women clinically diagnosed with menorrhagia was 217 g (median 207, range 63-402) (p<0.0001 compared to healthy women). The seven healthy women using oral contraceptives discharged 13 g (13-19) (p=0.0004 compared with normals). Menstruation lasted < eight days in 77/78 healthy women and in 12 of 17 clinically diagnosed menorrhagic women. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of menstrual flow total weight accurately reflects clinically assessed normal, increased and decreased flow. The method is an easy and accurate way of objectively estimating menstrual flow.
DescriptionTo access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field
- Menstrual blood loss measurement with gynaeseal.
- Authors: Gleeson N, Devitt M, Buggy F, Bonnar J
- Issue date: 1993 Feb
- A new method for measuring menstrual blood loss and its use in screening women before endometrial ablation.
- Authors: Gannon MJ, Day P, Hammadieh N, Johnson N
- Issue date: 1996 Oct
- Determination of total menstrual blood loss.
- Authors: Wyatt KM, Dimmock PW, Walker TJ, O'Brien PM
- Issue date: 2001 Jul
- Estimating menstrual blood loss in women with normal and excessive menstrual fluid volume.
- Authors: Fraser IS, Warner P, Marantos PA
- Issue date: 2001 Nov
- Measurement of menstrual blood loss in patients complaining of menorrhagia.
- Authors: Haynes PJ, Hodgson H, Anderson AB, Turnbull AC
- Issue date: 1977 Oct