Relative validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire used in pregnant women from a rural area of China.
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Li, MinHalldorsson, Thorhallur I
Bjerregaard, Anne A
Che, Yan
Mao, Yanyan
Hu, Wenfu
Wang, Yu
Zhou, Weijin
Olsen, Sjúrdur F
Strøm, Marin
Issue Date
2014-11
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014, 93 (11):1141-9Abstract
Food frequency questionnaires are relatively inexpensive, easy and quick to administer, but the construction of a food frequency questionnaire that can capture Chinese food habits is challenging given the diverse lifestyle and eating habits in different parts of the country. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reproducibility of a self-administered food frequency questionnaire against a 3-day dietary recall in a rural region of western China.Prospective cohort study.
Chinese maternal and child healthcare hospital.
A total of 168 healthy pregnant women.
Pregnant women completed a food frequency questionnaire at 16-24 weeks gestation, and again at 29-31 weeks; during weeks 26-27 they completed a 3-day dietary recall.
In general, mean intake was higher when assessed with food frequency questionnaires compared with dietary recall. Spearman and intra-class correlation coefficients between the two food frequency questionnaires ranged from 0.31 to 0.69 and from 0.27 to 0.79, respectively. For the second food frequency questionnaire and the dietary recall, the crude and de-attenuated Spearman correlations ranged from 0.12 to 0.55 and 0.14 to 0.58, respectively. The correlation both between the two food frequency questionnaires and between the second food frequency questionnaire and the dietary recall decreased after adjustment for energy. Ranking women, 31-57% and 1-8% were classified into the same and the opposite quartile, respectively, by both food frequency questionnaires; 30-45% and 1-11% were classified into the same and the opposite quartile respectively for the second food frequency questionnaire and dietary recall.
The food frequency questionnaire showed good reproducibility and correlations with dietary recall; it is useful for ranking study participants according to dietary intake, which is of great importance to future etiological studies in this cohort.
Description
To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink at the bottom of the pageAdditional Links
http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/aogs.12460.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.12460/epdf
Rights
Archived with thanks to Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavicaae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/aogs.12460
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Reproducibility and relative validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for Chinese pregnant women.
- Authors: Zhang H, Qiu X, Zhong C, Zhang K, Xiao M, Yi N, Xiong G, Wang J, Yao J, Hao L, Wei S, Yang N, Yang X
- Issue date: 2015 Jun 4
- Validity and reproducibility of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for use among pregnant women in rural China.
- Authors: Cheng Y, Yan H, Dibley MJ, Shen Y, Li Q, Zeng L
- Issue date: 2008
- Relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire to assess nutrient intake in pregnant women.
- Authors: McGowan CA, Curran S, McAuliffe FM
- Issue date: 2014 Apr
- Development, reproducibility and validity of the food frequency questionnaire in the Poland arm of the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiological (PURE) study.
- Authors: Dehghan M, Ilow R, Zatonska K, Szuba A, Zhang X, Mente A, Regulska-Ilow B
- Issue date: 2012 Jun
- Use of a three-day estimated food record, a 72-hour recall and a food-frequency questionnaire for dietary assessment in a Mediterranean Spanish population.
- Authors: Schröder H, Covas MI, Marrugat J, Vila J, Pena A, Alcántara M, Masiá R
- Issue date: 2001 Oct