• English
    • íslenska
  • English 
    • English
    • íslenska
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • ec_fundedresources to openaire
  • ec_fundedresources to openaire
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • ec_fundedresources to openaire
  • ec_fundedresources to openaire
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of HirslaCommunitiesAuthorsTitleSubjectsSubject (MeSH)Issue DateJournalThis CollectionAuthorsTitleSubjectsSubject (MeSH)Issue DateJournal

My Account

LoginRegister

Local Links

FAQ - (Icelandic)FAQ - (English)Hirsla LogosAbout LandspitaliLSH Home PageLibrary HomeIcelandic Journals

Statistics

Display statistics

Consensus and conflict cards for metabolic pathway databases.

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Average rating
 
   votes
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
 
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Stobbe, Miranda D
Swertz, Morris A
Thiele, Ines
Rengaw, Trebor
van Kampen, Antoine H C
Moerland, Perry D
Issue Date
2013

Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
BMC Syst Biol. 2013, 7:50
Abstract
The metabolic network of H. sapiens and many other organisms is described in multiple pathway databases. The level of agreement between these descriptions, however, has proven to be low. We can use these different descriptions to our advantage by identifying conflicting information and combining their knowledge into a single, more accurate, and more complete description. This task is, however, far from trivial.
We introduce the concept of Consensus and Conflict Cards (C₂Cards) to provide concise overviews of what the databases do or do not agree on. Each card is centered at a single gene, EC number or reaction. These three complementary perspectives make it possible to distinguish disagreements on the underlying biology of a metabolic process from differences that can be explained by different decisions on how and in what detail to represent knowledge. As a proof-of-concept, we implemented C₂Cards(Human), as a web application http://www.molgenis.org/c2cards, covering five human pathway databases.
C₂Cards can contribute to ongoing reconciliation efforts by simplifying the identification of consensus and conflicts between pathway databases and lowering the threshold for experts to contribute. Several case studies illustrate the potential of the C₂Cards in identifying disagreements on the underlying biology of a metabolic process. The overviews may also point out controversial biological knowledge that should be subject of further research. Finally, the examples provided emphasize the importance of manual curation and the need for a broad community involvement.
Description
To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink at the bottom of the page
Additional Links
http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/1752-0509-7-50
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3703255/
Rights
openAccess
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1186/1752-0509-7-50
Scopus Count
Collections
ec_fundedresources to openaire

entitlement

Related articles

  • Critical assessment of human metabolic pathway databases: a stepping stone for future integration.
  • Authors: Stobbe MD, Houten SM, Jansen GA, van Kampen AH, Moerland PD
  • Issue date: 2011 Oct 14
  • Data mining in the MetaCyc family of pathway databases.
  • Authors: Karp PD, Paley S, Altman T
  • Issue date: 2013
  • Knowledge representation in metabolic pathway databases.
  • Authors: Stobbe MD, Jansen GA, Moerland PD, van Kampen AH
  • Issue date: 2014 May
  • Improving the description of metabolic networks: the TCA cycle as example.
  • Authors: Stobbe MD, Houten SM, van Kampen AH, Wanders RJ, Moerland PD
  • Issue date: 2012 Sep
  • Biocuration workflows and text mining: overview of the BioCreative 2012 Workshop Track II.
  • Authors: Lu Z, Hirschman L
  • Issue date: 2012

DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.