How much is too much? Threshold dose distributions for 5 food allergens.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
AuthorsBallmer-Weber, Barbara K
Mackie, Alan R
Salt, Louise J
Hourihane, Jonathan O'B
de Blay, Frédéric
Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G
Knulst, André C
Sprikkelman, Aline B
van Ree, Ronald
Mills, E N Clare
MetadataShow full item record
CitationJ. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 135 (4):964-71
AbstractPrecautionary labeling is used to warn consumers of the presence of unintended allergens, but the lack of agreed allergen thresholds can result in confusion and risk taking by patients with food allergy. The lack of data on threshold doses below which subjects are unlikely to react is preventing the development of evidence-based allergen management strategies that are understood by clinician and patient alike.
We sought to define threshold dose distributions for 5 major allergenic foods in the European population.
Patients with food allergy were drawn from the EuroPrevall birth cohort, community surveys, and outpatient clinic studies and invited to undergo a food challenge. Low-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges were undertaken with commercially available food ingredients (peanut, hazelnut, celery, fish, and shrimp) blinded into common matrices. Dose distributions were modeled by using interval-censoring survival analysis with 3 parametric approaches.
Of the 5 foods used for challenge, 4 produced similar dose distributions, with estimated doses eliciting reactions in 10% of the allergic population (ED10), ranging from 1.6 to 10.1 mg of protein for hazelnut, peanut, and celery with overlapping 95% CIs. ED10 values for fish were somewhat higher (27.3 mg of protein), although the CIs were wide and overlapping between fish and plant foods. Shrimp provided radically different dose distributions, with an ED10 value of 2.5 g of protein.
This evidence base will contribute to the development of reference doses and action levels for allergens in foods below which only the most sensitive subjects might react.
DescriptionTo access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink at the bottom of the page
RightsArchived with thanks to The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology
- Threshold dose distributions for 5 major allergenic foods in children.
- Authors: Blom WM, Vlieg-Boerstra BJ, Kruizinga AG, van der Heide S, Houben GF, Dubois AE
- Issue date: 2013 Jan
- The EuroPrevall outpatient clinic study on food allergy: background and methodology.
- Authors: Fernández-Rivas M, Barreales L, Mackie AR, Fritsche P, Vázquez-Cortés S, Jedrzejczak-Czechowicz M, Kowalski ML, Clausen M, Gislason D, Sinaniotis A, Kompoti E, Le TM, Knulst AC, Purohit A, de Blay F, Kralimarkova T, Popov T, Asero R, Belohlavkova S, Seneviratne SL, Dubakiene R, Lidholm J, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K, Burney P, Crevel R, Brill M, Fernández-Pérez C, Vieths S, Clare Mills EN, van Ree R, Ballmer-Weber BK
- Issue date: 2015 May
- Allergen reference doses for precautionary labeling (VITAL 2.0): clinical implications.
- Authors: Allen KJ, Remington BC, Baumert JL, Crevel RW, Houben GF, Brooke-Taylor S, Kruizinga AG, Taylor SL
- Issue date: 2014 Jan
- Peanut Allergen Threshold Study (PATS): Novel single-dose oral food challenge study to validate eliciting doses in children with peanut allergy.
- Authors: Hourihane JO, Allen KJ, Shreffler WG, Dunngalvin G, Nordlee JA, Zurzolo GA, Dunngalvin A, Gurrin LC, Baumert JL, Taylor SL
- Issue date: 2017 May
- Updated population minimal eliciting dose distributions for use in risk assessment of 14 priority food allergens.
- Authors: Remington BC, Westerhout J, Meima MY, Blom WM, Kruizinga AG, Wheeler MW, Taylor SL, Houben GF, Baumert JL
- Issue date: 2020 May