Comparing GFR Estimating Equations Using Cystatin C and Creatinine in Elderly Individuals.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Levey, Andrew S
Andresdottir, Margret B
Indridason, Olafur S
Inker, Lesley A
MetadataShow full item record
CitationJ. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2015, 26 (8):1982-9
AbstractCurrent guidelines recommend reporting eGFR using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations unless other equations are more accurate, and recommend the combination of creatinine and cystatin C (eGFRcr-cys) as more accurate than either eGFRcr or eGFRcys alone. However, preferred equations and filtration markers in elderly individuals are debated. In 805 adults enrolled in the community-based Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility (AGES)-Reykjavik Study, we measured GFR (mGFR) using plasma clearance of iohexol, standardized creatinine and cystatin C, and eGFR using the CKD-EPI, Japanese, Berlin Initiative Study (BIS), and Caucasian and Asian pediatric and adult subjects (CAPA) equations. We evaluated equation performance using bias, precision, and two measures of accuracy. We first compared the Japanese, BIS, and CAPA equations with the CKD-EPI equations to determine the preferred equations, and then compared eGFRcr and eGFRcys with eGFRcr-cys using the preferred equations. Mean (SD) age was 80.3 (4.0) years. Median (25th, 75th) mGFR was 64 (52, 73) ml/min per 1.73 m(2), and the prevalence of decreased GFR was 39% (95% confidence interval, 35.8 to 42.5). Among 24 comparisons with the other equations, CKD-EPI equations performed better in 9, similar in 13, and worse in 2. Using the CKD-EPI equations, eGFRcr-cys performed better than eGFRcr in four metrics, better than eGFRcys in two metrics, and similar to eGFRcys in two metrics. In conclusion, neither the Japanese, BIS, nor CAPA equations were superior to the CKD-EPI equations in this cohort of community-dwelling elderly individuals. Using the CKD-EPI equations, eGFRcr-cys performed better than eGFRcr or eGFRcys.
DescriptionTo access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink at the bottom of the page
RightsArchived with thanks to Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN
- Applicability of chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration equations in a Chinese population.
- Authors: Zhang M, Chen Y, Tang L, Zhang J, Liu S, Wang S, Wei R, Zhou J, Cao X, Zhang W, Zhang J, Yang Y, Cai G, Sun X, Chen X
- Issue date: 2014 Mar
- Glomerular filtration rate estimation using cystatin C alone or combined with creatinine as a confirmatory test.
- Authors: Fan L, Inker LA, Rossert J, Froissart M, Rossing P, Mauer M, Levey AS
- Issue date: 2014 Jun
- Estimation of glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C in octogenarians and nonagenarians.
- Authors: Lopes MB, Araújo LQ, Passos MT, Nishida SK, Kirsztajn GM, Cendoroglo MS, Sesso RC
- Issue date: 2013 Dec 2
- Performance of cystatin C- and creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate equations depends on patient characteristics.
- Authors: Meeusen JW, Rule AD, Voskoboev N, Baumann NA, Lieske JC
- Issue date: 2015 Oct
- Comparison of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate with Both Serum Creatinine and Cystatin C (eGFRcr-cys) versus Single Analyte (eGFRcr or eGFRcys) Using CKD-EPI and MDRD Equations in Tertiary Care Hospital Settings.
- Authors: Khalid UB, Haroon ZH, Aamir M, Ain QU, Mansoor K, Jaffar SR
- Issue date: 2020 Jul