• English
    • íslenska
  • English 
    • English
    • íslenska
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • ec_fundedresources to openaire
  • ec_fundedresources to openaire
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • ec_fundedresources to openaire
  • ec_fundedresources to openaire
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of HirslaCommunitiesAuthorsTitleSubjectsSubject (MeSH)Issue DateJournalThis CollectionAuthorsTitleSubjectsSubject (MeSH)Issue DateJournal

My Account

LoginRegister

Local Links

FAQ - (Icelandic)FAQ - (English)Hirsla LogosAbout LandspitaliLSH Home PageLibrary HomeIcelandic Journals

Statistics

Display statistics

Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study.

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Average rating
 
   votes
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
 
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Macfarlane, A J
Blondel, B
Mohangoo, A D
Cuttini, M
Nijhuis, J
Novak, Z
Ólafsdóttir, H S
Zeitlin, J
Issue Date
2016-03

Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
BJOG 2016, 123 (4):559-68
Abstract
To use data from routine sources to compare rates of obstetric intervention in Europe both overall and for subgroups at higher risk of intervention.
Retrospective analysis of aggregated routine data.
Thirty-one European countries or regions contributing data on mode of delivery to the Euro-Peristat project.
Births in participating countries in 2010.
Countries provided aggregated data about overall rates of obstetric intervention and about caesarean section rates for specified subgroups.
Mode of delivery.
Rates of caesarean section ranged from 14.8% to 52.2% of all births and rates of instrumental vaginal delivery ranged from 0.5% to 16.4%. Overall, there was no association between rates of instrumental vaginal delivery and rates of caesarean section, but similarities were observed between some countries that are geographically close and may share common traditions of practice. Associations were observed between caesarean section rates for women with breech and vertex births and with singleton and multiple births but patterns of association for women who had and had not had previous caesarean sections were more complex.
The persisting wide variations in caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery rates point to a lack of consensus about practice and raise questions for further investigation. Further research is needed to explore the impact of differences in clinical guidelines, healthcare systems and their financing and parents' and professionals' attitudes to care at delivery.
Description
To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink at the bottom of the page
Additional Links
http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/1471-0528.13284
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.13284/epdf
Rights
restrictedAccess
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/1471-0528.13284
Scopus Count
Collections
ec_fundedresources to openaire

entitlement

Related articles

  • How useful are national caesarean section rates for monitoring quality of perinatal care?
  • Authors: Mathai M
  • Issue date: 2016 Mar
  • Caesarean section rates in subgroups of women and perinatal outcomes.
  • Authors: Zhang J, Geerts C, Hukkelhoven C, Offerhaus P, Zwart J, de Jonge A
  • Issue date: 2016 Apr
  • Preterm birth and multiple pregnancy in European countries participating in the PERISTAT project.
  • Authors: Blondel B, Macfarlane A, Gissler M, Breart G, Zeitlin J, PERISTAT Study Group.
  • Issue date: 2006 May
  • Are pregnant women's obstetric care preferences contemplated in a provider-dominated maternity care system?
  • Authors: Mariona FG
  • Issue date: 2016 Mar
  • Outcome of term breech births: 10-year experience at a district general hospital.
  • Authors: Pradhan P, Mohajer M, Deshpande S
  • Issue date: 2005 Feb

DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.