How to measure snoring? A comparison of the microphone, cannula and piezoelectric sensor.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
AuthorsArnardottir, Erna S
Agustsson, Jon S
Sigurdsson, Gunnar A
Sigurgunnarsdottir, Magdalena O
Sigurđarson, Gudjon T
Sveinbjarnarson, Atli T
MetadataShow full item record
CitationHow to measure snoring? A comparison of the microphone, cannula and piezoelectric sensor. 2016, 25 (2):158-68 J Sleep Res
AbstractThe objective of this study was to compare to each other the methods currently recommended by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) to measure snoring: an acoustic sensor, a piezoelectric sensor and a nasal pressure transducer (cannula). Ten subjects reporting habitual snoring were included in the study, performed at Landspitali-University Hospital, Iceland. Snoring was assessed by listening to the air medium microphone located on a patient's chest, compared to listening to two overhead air medium microphones (stereo) and manual scoring of a piezoelectric sensor and nasal cannula vibrations. The chest audio picked up the highest number of snore events of the different snore sensors. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of scoring snore events from the different sensors was compared to the chest audio: overhead audio (0.78, 0.98), cannula (0.55, 0.67) and piezoelectric sensor (0.78, 0.92), respectively. The chest audio was capable of detecting snore events with lower volume and higher fundamental frequency than the other sensors. The 200 Hz sampling rate of the cannula and piezoelectric sensor was one of their limitations for detecting snore events. The different snore sensors do not measure snore events in the same manner. This lack of consistency will affect future research on the clinical significance of snoring. Standardization of objective snore measurements is therefore needed. Based on this paper, snore measurements should be audio-based and the use of the cannula as a snore sensor be discontinued, but the piezoelectric sensor could possibly be modified for improvement.
DescriptionTo access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink at the bottom of the page
RightsArchived with thanks to Journal of sleep research
- Automatic detection of whole night snoring events using non-contact microphone.
- Authors: Dafna E, Tarasiuk A, Zigel Y
- Issue date: 2013
- Diagnostic accuracy of nasal cannula versus microphone for detection of snoring.
- Authors: Pérez-Warnisher MT, Gómez-García T, Giraldo-Cadavid LF, Troncoso Acevedo MF, Rodríguez Rodríguez P, Carballosa de Miguel P, González Mangado N
- Issue date: 2017 Dec
- Acoustics of snoring and automatic snore sound detection in children.
- Authors: Çavuşoğlu M, Poets CF, Urschitz MS
- Issue date: 2017 Oct 31
- Automatic and unsupervised snore sound extraction from respiratory sound signals.
- Authors: Azarbarzin A, Moussavi ZM
- Issue date: 2011 May
- Characteristics of the snoring noise in patients with and without occlusive sleep apnea.
- Authors: Perez-Padilla JR, Slawinski E, Difrancesco LM, Feige RR, Remmers JE, Whitelaw WA
- Issue date: 1993 Mar