• English
    • íslenska
  • English 
    • English
    • íslenska
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Journal Articles, Peer Reviewed (Ritrýndar vísindagreinar)
  • Icelandic Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Journal Articles, Peer Reviewed (Ritrýndar vísindagreinar)
  • Icelandic Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of HirslaCommunitiesAuthorsTitleSubjectsSubject (MeSH)Issue DateJournalThis CollectionAuthorsTitleSubjectsSubject (MeSH)Issue DateJournal

My Account

LoginRegister

Local Links

FAQ - (Icelandic)FAQ - (English)Hirsla LogosAbout LandspitaliLSH Home PageLibrary HomeIcelandic Journals

Statistics

Display statistics

Lífslokameðferð: Reynsla og viðhorf hjúkrunarfræðinga til umönnunar deyjandi einstaklinga og notkunar meðferðarferlisins Liverpool Care Pathway. Forprófun á spurningalista

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Thumbnail
Name:
Lifslokamedferd.pdf
Size:
654.5Kb
Format:
PDF
Download
Average rating
 
   votes
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
 
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Þórunn Pálsdóttir
Elísabet Hjörleifsdóttir
Issue Date
2016

Metadata
Show full item record
Other Titles
An investigation of nurses’ evalutaion of their own skill in end-of-life care and their attitudes towards using Liverpool care pathway: a pilot study of the end-of-life care questionnaire
Citation
Tímarit hjúkrunarfræðinga 2016, 92(3):1-12
Abstract
Tilgangur: Markmið rannsóknarinnar var að kanna hvernig íslenskir hjúkrunarfræðingar meta eigin færni í lífslokameðferð, skoða tengsl á milli bakgrunnsbreyta og viðhorf þátttakenda til notkunar á Meðferðarferli fyrir deyjandi (Liverpool Care Pathway, LCP). Einnig var tilgangurinn að forprófa réttmæti og áreiðanleika íslenskrar útgáfu á spurningalista um lífslokameðferð (End-of-Life Care questionnaire). Aðferð: Rannsóknaraðferðin var megindleg, lýsandi þversniðsrannsókn. Spurningalisti var sendur til 476 hjúkrunarfræðinga um land allt. Spurt var um þætti tengda umönnun í lífslokameðferð og ánægju þátttakenda með notkun Meðferðarferlis fyrir deyjandi. Framkvæmd var þáttagreining og lýsandi tölfræði beitt til að lýsa eiginleikum tölulegra gagna. Niðurstöður: Svarhlutfall var 40,8% (n=194). Þátttakendur töldu sig hafa sjálfstraust og færni í störfum sínum tengdum lífslokameðferð. Ánægja þeirra með notkun Meðferðarferlis fyrir deyjandi reyndist ekki vera afgerandi. Þáttagreining leiddi í ljós fimm þætti: Kostir Meðferðarferlis fyrir deyjandi, Sjálfsöryggi í umönnun, Sjálfsöryggi í samskiptum, Uppfylling þarfa og Þverfagleg hópvinna. Þáttahleðslur voru á bilinu 0,503-0,864. Cronbachs-alfa áreiðanleikastuðull var á bilinu 0,69-0,94. Marktæk fylgni var á milli hærri aldurs og sjálfsöryggis í umönnun (r=-0,187, p=0,01), starfsaldurs og sjálfsöryggis í umönnun (r=-0,271, p=0,01) og lengri starfsaldurs og sjálfsöryggis í samskiptum (r=-0,208, p=0,01). Þeir sem notuðu Meðferðarferli fyrir deyjandi voru líklegri til að hafa meira sjálfsöryggi í umönnun (p=0,012) og höfðu oftar stuðning af þverfaglegum hópi (p<0,001) en þeir sem ekki notuðu það. Ályktanir: Spurningalisti rannsóknarinnar reyndist hentugur til rannsókna á sviði lífslokameðferðar. Ætla má að hjúkrunarfræðingar búi yfir færni og hafi sjálfstraust þegar kemur að lífslokameðferð og hafi stuðning af þverfaglegum hópi. Þörf er á frekari rannsóknum á Íslandi á gagnsemi Meðferðarferlis fyrir deyjandi í lífslokameðferð.
Aim: The aim of this research was to investigate how Icelandic nurses’ evaluate their skills in end-of-life care, to look at correlations between variables and participants’ attitudes towards the use of the Icelandic version of the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP). Furthermore, the aim was to pilot test the validity and reliability of the Icelandic version of the questionnaire End-of-Life Care. Method: This was a quantitative cross-sectional survey. A questionnaire was sent to 476 nurses across Iceland. Questions included factors related to end-of-life care and satisfaction with the utility of LCP. Exploratory factor analysis and descriptive statistics were performed to describe the characteristics of the data. Results: Response rate was 40,8% (n=194). The participants felt self-confident in their work related to end-of-life care. Their satisfaction with using the LCP was not decisive. Exploratory factor analysis revealed five factors: The benefits of LCP in care of the dying, Self confidence in caring, Self confidence in communication, Fulfilling needs and Interdisciplinary teamwork. Factor loadings were between 0.503 and 0.864. Cronbach’s Alpha range was 0.69 - 0.94. Significant correlation was found between: higher age and self confidence in caring (r=-0.187, p=0.01), work experience and self confidence in caring (r=-0.271, p=0.01), work experience and self confidence in communications (r=-0.208, p=0.01). Those who used LCP were more likely to have more self confidence in caring (p=0.012) and benefitted more often from interdisciplinary teamwork (p<0.001) than those who did not. Conclusion: The questionnaire proved to be suitable for studies in end-of-life care. The inference can be drawn that nurses feel self confident when it comes to end-of-life care and benefit from interdisciplinary teamwork. The usefulness of the Icelandic version of the LCP in end-of-life care needs further investigation.
Description
Efst á síðunni er hægt að nálgast greinina í heild sinni með því að smella á hlekkinn
Additional Links
http://hjukrun.is/timarit-hjukrunarfraedinga/tolublod/3.-tbl-2016/
Collections
Icelandic Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)

entitlement

 

DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.