Pregnant women's preference for cesarean section and subsequent mode of birth - a six-country cohort study.
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Útgáfudagur
2016-09
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Pregnant women's preference for cesarean section and subsequent mode of birth - a six-country cohort study. 2016, 37 (3):75-83 J Psychosom Obstet GynaecolÚtdráttur
The rate of cesarean section (CS) for non-medical reasons has risen and it is a concern for health care. Women's preferences may vary across countries for psychosocial or obstetric reasons.A prospective cohort study of 6549 women in routine antenatal care giving birth in Belgium, Iceland, Denmark, Estonia, Norway or Sweden. Preference for mode of birth was self-reported in mid-pregnancy. Birth outcome data were collected from hospital records.
A CS was preferred by 3.5% of primiparous women and 8.7% of the multiparous women. Preference for CS was associated with severe fear of childbirth (FOC), with a negative birth experience in multiparous women and with depressive symptoms in the primiparous. Women were somewhat more prone to prefer a cesarean in Iceland, odd ratio (OR) 1.70 (1.02-2.83), adjusted for age, education, depression, FOC, history of abuse, previous cesarean and negative birth experience. Out of the 404 women who preferred CS during pregnancy, 286 (70.8%) delivered by CS, mostly for a medical indication. A total of 9% of the cesareans in the cohort had a non-medical indication only.
Women's preference for CS often seems to be due to health concerns. Both medical and psychological factors need to be addressed in antenatal counseling. Obstetricians need to convey accurately to women the risks and benefits of CS in her specific case. Maternity professionals should identify and explore psychosocial reasons for women's preferences.
Lu00FDsing
To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink at the bottom of the pageVefslóð
http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/0167482X.2016.1181055http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0167482X.2016.1181055
Rights
Archived with thanks to Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecologyae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/0167482X.2016.1181055
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Women's preference for caesarean section and the actual mode of delivery - Comparing five sites in Norway.
- Authors: Lindstad Løvåsmoen EM, Nyland Bjørgo M, Lukasse M, Schei B, Henriksen L
- Issue date: 2018 Jun
- Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors.
- Authors: Karlström A, Nystedt A, Johansson M, Hildingsson I
- Issue date: 2011 Oct
- Fear of childbirth and risk of cesarean delivery: a cohort study in six European countries.
- Authors: Ryding EL, Lukasse M, Parys AS, Wangel AM, Karro H, Kristjansdottir H, Schroll AM, Schei B, Bidens Group.
- Issue date: 2015 Mar
- Preference for cesarean section in young nulligravid women in eight OECD countries and implications for reproductive health education.
- Authors: Stoll KH, Hauck YL, Downe S, Payne D, Hall WA, International Childbirth Attitudes- Prior to Pregnancy (ICAPP) Study Team.
- Issue date: 2017 Sep 12
- Maternal reasons for requesting planned cesarean section in Norway: a qualitative study.
- Authors: Eide KT, Morken NH, Bærøe K
- Issue date: 2019 Mar 29