Yes we can! Successful examples of disallowing 'conscientious objection' in reproductive health care.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Gemzell Danielsson, Kristina
Guðmundsson, Jens A
MetadataShow full item record
CitationYes we can! Successful examples of disallowing 'conscientious objection' in reproductive health care. 2016, 21 (3):201-6 Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care
AbstractReproductive health care is the only field in medicine where health care professionals (HCPs) are allowed to limit a patient's access to a legal medical treatment - usually abortion or contraception - by citing their 'freedom of conscience.' However, the authors' position is that 'conscientious objection' ('CO') in reproductive health care should be called dishonourable disobedience because it violates medical ethics and the right to lawful health care, and should therefore be disallowed. Three countries - Sweden, Finland, and Iceland - do not generally permit HCPs in the public health care system to refuse to perform a legal medical service for reasons of 'CO' when the service is part of their professional duties. The purpose of investigating the laws and experiences of these countries was to show that disallowing 'CO' is workable and beneficial. It facilitates good access to reproductive health services because it reduces barriers and delays. Other benefits include the prioritisation of evidence-based medicine, rational arguments, and democratic laws over faith-based refusals. Most notably, disallowing 'CO' protects women's basic human rights, avoiding both discrimination and harms to health. Finally, holding HCPs accountable for their professional obligations to patients does not result in negative impacts. Almost all HCPs and medical students in Sweden, Finland, and Iceland who object to abortion or contraception are able to find work in another field of medicine. The key to successfully disallowing 'CO' is a country's strong prior acceptance of women's civil rights, including their right to health care.
DescriptionTo access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink at the bottom of the page
RightsArchived with thanks to The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception
- Proposal to inform European institutions regarding the regulation of conscientious objection to abortion.
- Authors: Lertxundi R, Ibarrondo O, Merki-Feld GS, Rey-Novoa M, Rowlands S, Mar J
- Issue date: 2016 Jun
- There is no defence for 'Conscientious objection' in reproductive health care.
- Authors: Fiala C, Arthur JH
- Issue date: 2017 Sep
- Conscientious objection and refusal to provide reproductive healthcare: a White Paper examining prevalence, health consequences, and policy responses.
- Authors: Chavkin W, Leitman L, Polin K, for Global Doctors for Choice.
- Issue date: 2013 Dec
- Conscientious objection to abortion and reproductive healthcare: a review of recent literature and implications for adolescents.
- Authors: Morrell KM, Chavkin W
- Issue date: 2015 Oct
- A critical review of conscientious objection and decriminalisation of abortion in Chile.
- Authors: Montero A, Villarroel R
- Issue date: 2018 Apr