Variations in rates of severe perineal tears and episiotomies in 20 European countries: a study based on routine national data in Euro-Peristat Project.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Bjarnadóttir, Ragnheiður I
Hindori-Mohangoo, Ashna D
MetadataShow full item record
CitationVariations in rates of severe perineal tears and episiotomies in 20 European countries: a study based on routine national data in Euro-Peristat Project. 2016, 95 (7):746-54 Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
AbstractRates of severe perineal tears and episiotomies are indicators of obstetrical quality of care, but their use for international comparisons is complicated by difficulties with accurate ascertainment of tears and uncertainties regarding the optimal rate of episiotomies. We compared rates of severe perineal tears and episiotomies in European countries and analysed the association between these two indicators.
We used aggregate data from national routine statistics available in the Euro-Peristat project. We compared rates of severe (third- and fourth-degree) tears and episiotomies in 2010 by mode of vaginal delivery (n = 20 countries), and investigated time trends between 2004 and 2010 (n = 9 countries). Statistical associations were assessed with Spearman's ranked correlations (rho).
In 2010 in all vaginal deliveries, rates of severe tears ranged from 0.1% in Romania to 4.9% in Iceland, and rates of episiotomies from 3.7% in Denmark to 75.0% in Cyprus. A negative correlation between the rates of episiotomies and severe tears was observed in all deliveries (rho = -0.66; p = 0.001), instrumental deliveries (rho = -0.67; p = 0.002) and non-instrumental deliveries (rho = -0.72; p < 0.001). However there was no relation between time trends of these two indicators (rho = 0.43; p = 0.28).
The large variations in severe tears and episiotomies and the negative association between these indicators in 2010 show the importance of improving the assessment and reporting of tears in each country, and evaluating the impact of low episiotomy rates on the perineum.
DescriptionTo access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink at the bottom of the page
RightsArchived with thanks to Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
- [Evaluating a policy of restrictive episiotomy before and after practice guidelines by the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists].
- Authors: Eckman A, Ramanah R, Gannard E, Clement MC, Collet G, Courtois L, Martin A, Cossa S, Maillet R, Riethmuller D
- Issue date: 2010 Feb
- Third degree perineal tears in a university medical center where midline episiotomies are not performed.
- Authors: Sheiner E, Levy A, Walfisch A, Hallak M, Mazor M
- Issue date: 2005 Apr
- The role of episiotomy in instrumental delivery: is it preventative for severe perineal injury?
- Authors: Hudelist G, Mastoroudes H, Gorti M
- Issue date: 2008 Jul
- Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors.
- Authors: Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Mahmood TA, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, Templeton A, van der Meulen JH
- Issue date: 2013 Nov
- Implementation of the RCOG guidelines for prevention of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) at two London Hospitals: A time series analysis.
- Authors: Mohiudin H, Ali S, Pisal PN, Villar R
- Issue date: 2018 May