• English
    • íslenska
  • English 
    • English
    • íslenska
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Journal Articles, Peer Reviewed (Ritrýndar vísindagreinar)
  • English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Journal Articles, Peer Reviewed (Ritrýndar vísindagreinar)
  • English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of HirslaCommunitiesAuthorsTitleSubjectsSubject (MeSH)Issue DateJournalThis CollectionAuthorsTitleSubjectsSubject (MeSH)Issue DateJournal

My Account

LoginRegister

Local Links

FAQ - (Icelandic)FAQ - (English)Hirsla LogosAbout LandspitaliLSH Home PageLibrary HomeIcelandic Journals

Statistics

Display statistics

Improving Planning and Post-Operative Assessment for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Thumbnail
Name:
4913-18018-2-PB.pdf
Size:
969.5Kb
Format:
PDF
Download
Average rating
 
   votes
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
 
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Magnússon, Benedikt
Pétursson, Þröstur
Edmunds, Kyle
Magnúsdóttir, Gígja
Halldórsson, Grétar
Jr, Halldór Jónsson
Gargiulo, Paolo
Issue Date
2015-03-11

Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
Improving Planning and Post-Operative Assessment for Total Hip Arthroplasty. 2015, 25 (2):4913 Eur J Transl Myol
Abstract
Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) remains the gold standard of treatment for patients who suffer with a variety of hip-related pathological degeneration or trauma. These patients often exhibit significantly less post-operative pain and an increase in the range of motion of the joint, but there are still relatively common instances of debilitating periprosthetic complications that call into question the method for pre-surgical implant choice. Currently, there are two principal options for THA prostheses: cemented or non cemented. Utilizing the cemented procedure ensures a faster acquisition of adequate implant stability than with the non cemented procedure, but can eventually lead to an increased periprosthetic fracture risk. Non cemented prosthetic stems are more frequently revised within the first few years following THA due to periprosthetic fracture, but non cemented revision surgeries generally result in fewer complications than those of cemented implants. Surgeons typically rely on experience or simple patient metrics such as age and sex to prescribe which implant procedure is optimal, and while this may work for most patients, there is a clear need to analyze more rigoriously patient conditions that correlate to optimal post-THA outcomes. The results from the investigation reported herein indicate that an understanding of how the percent composition and quality of a patient's quadriceps muscle in both healthy and operated legs may be a better indicator for prosthetic choice. Additionally, these data emphasize that the traditional metrics of age and sex inadequately predict changes in quadriceps composition and quality and thereby have comparatively minor utility in determining the patient-appropriate prosthetic type.
Total Hip Arthroplasty, Prosthetic selection, Muscle size and quality, Anatomical modeling, Surgical planning.
Description
To access publisher's full text version of this article, please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field or click on the hyperlink at the top of the page marked Files. This article is open access.
Additional Links
http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4081/ejtm.2015.4913
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4749013/
Rights
Archived with thanks to European journal of translational myology
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.4081/ejtm.2015.4913
Scopus Count
Collections
English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)

entitlement

Related articles

  • [Periprosthetic fractures of the hip].
  • Authors: Weissinger M, Helmreich C, Pöll G
  • Issue date: 2009 Jun
  • Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
  • Authors: Hailer NP, Garellick G, Kärrholm J
  • Issue date: 2010 Feb
  • Epidemiology of periprosthetic femoral fractures in 5417 revision total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience.
  • Authors: Abdel MP, Houdek MT, Watts CD, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ
  • Issue date: 2016 Apr
  • Radiographic evaluation of early periprosthetic acetabular bone contrast and prosthetic head acetabular coverage after uncemented and cemented total hip prosthesis in dogs.
  • Authors: Mostafa AA, Lucas K, Nolte I, Wefstaedt P
  • Issue date: 2016 Dec 3
  • Fractures of the femoral neck: a review and personal statement.
  • Authors: Raaymakers EL
  • Issue date: 2006

DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.