A new framework for the documentation and interpretation of oral food challenges in population-based and clinical research.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
AuthorsGrabenhenrich, L B
Sprikkelman, A B
Grimshaw, K E C
Kowalski, M L
Papadopoulos, N G
van Ree, R
Mills, E N C
MetadataShow full item record
CitationA new framework for the documentation and interpretation of oral food challenges in population-based and clinical research. 2017, 72 (3):453-461 Allergy
AbstractThe conduct of oral food challenges as the preferred diagnostic standard for food allergy (FA) was harmonized over the last years. However, documentation and interpretation of challenge results, particularly in research settings, are not sufficiently standardized to allow valid comparisons between studies. Our aim was to develop a diagnostic toolbox to capture and report clinical observations in double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC).
A group of experienced allergists, paediatricians, dieticians, epidemiologists and data managers developed generic case report forms and standard operating procedures for DBPCFCs and piloted them in three clinical centres. The follow-up of the EuroPrevall/iFAAM birth cohort and other iFAAM work packages applied these methods.
A set of newly developed questionnaire or interview items capture the history of FA. Together with sensitization status, this forms the basis for the decision to perform a DBPCFC, following a standardized decision algorithm. A generic form including details about severity and timing captures signs and symptoms observed during or after the procedures. In contrast to the commonly used dichotomous outcome FA vs no FA, the allergy status is interpreted in multiple categories to reflect the complexity of clinical decision-making.
The proposed toolbox sets a standard for improved documentation and harmonized interpretation of DBPCFCs. By a detailed documentation and common terminology for communicating outcomes, these tools hope to reduce the influence of subjective judgment of supervising physicians. All forms are publicly available for further evolution and free use in clinical and research settings.
DescriptionTo access publisher's full text version of this article, please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field or click on the hyperlink at the top of the page marked Files
RightsArchived with thanks to Allergy
- Physician's appraisal vs documented signs and symptoms in the interpretation of food challenge tests: The EuroPrevall birth cohort.
- Authors: Grabenhenrich LB, Reich A, McBride D, Sprikkelman A, Roberts G, Grimshaw KEC, Fiocchi AG, Saxoni-Papageorgiou P, Papadopoulos NG, Fiandor A, Quirce S, Kowalski ML, Sigurdardottir ST, Dubakiene R, Hourihane JOB, Rosenfeld L, Niggemann B, Keil T, Beyer K
- Issue date: 2018 Feb
- Standardizing double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenges: American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology-European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology PRACTALL consensus report.
- Authors: Sampson HA, Gerth van Wijk R, Bindslev-Jensen C, Sicherer S, Teuber SS, Burks AW, Dubois AE, Beyer K, Eigenmann PA, Spergel JM, Werfel T, Chinchilli VM
- Issue date: 2012 Dec
- Prevalence of immunoglobulin E-mediated food allergy in 6-9-year-old urban schoolchildren in the eastern Black Sea region of Turkey.
- Authors: Orhan F, Karakas T, Cakir M, Aksoy A, Baki A, Gedik Y
- Issue date: 2009 Jul
- Late reactions in food-allergic children and adolescents after double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges.
- Authors: Saleh-Langenberg J, Flokstra-de Blok BM, AlAgla N, Kollen BJ, Dubois AE
- Issue date: 2016 Jul
- Differences between observers in interpreting double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges: a randomized trial.
- Authors: Brand PL, Landzaat-Berghuizen MA
- Issue date: 2014 Dec