Surgical Navigation Technology Based on Augmented Reality and Integrated 3D Intraoperative Imaging: A Spine Cadaveric Feasibility and Accuracy Study.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
van der Vaart, Nijs
MetadataShow full item record
CitationSurgical Navigation Technology Based on Augmented Reality and Integrated 3D Intraoperative Imaging: A Spine Cadaveric Feasibility and Accuracy Study. 2016, 41 (21):E1303-E1311 Spine
ÚtdrátturA cadaveric laboratory study.
The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement using augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN).
Recent advances in spinal navigation have shown improved accuracy in lumbosacral pedicle screw placement but limited benefits in the thoracic spine. 3D intraoperative imaging and instrument navigation may allow improved accuracy in pedicle screw placement, without the use of x-ray fluoroscopy, and thus opens the route to image-guided minimally invasive therapy in the thoracic spine.
ARSN encompasses a surgical table, a motorized flat detector C-arm with intraoperative 2D/3D capabilities, integrated optical cameras for augmented reality navigation, and noninvasive patient motion tracking. Two neurosurgeons placed 94 pedicle screws in the thoracic spine of four cadavers using ARSN on one side of the spine (47 screws) and free-hand technique on the contralateral side. X-ray fluoroscopy was not used for either technique. Four independent reviewers assessed the postoperative scans, using the Gertzbein grading. Morphometric measurements of the pedicles axial and sagittal widths and angles, as well as the vertebrae axial and sagittal rotations were performed to identify risk factors for breaches.
ARSN was feasible and superior to free-hand technique with respect to overall accuracy (85% vs. 64%, P < 0.05), specifically significant increases of perfectly placed screws (51% vs. 30%, P < 0.05) and reductions in breaches beyond 4 mm (2% vs. 25%, P < 0.05). All morphometric dimensions, except for vertebral body axial rotation, were risk factors for larger breaches when performed with the free-hand method.
ARSN without fluoroscopy was feasible and demonstrated higher accuracy than free-hand technique for thoracic pedicle screw placement.
Lu00FDsingEfst á síðunni er hægt að nálgast greinina í heild sinni með því að smella á hlekkinn
RightsArchived with thanks to Spine
- Pedicle Screw Placement Using Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation With Intraoperative 3D Imaging: A First In-Human Prospective Cohort Study.
- Authors: Elmi-Terander A, Burström G, Nachabe R, Skulason H, Pedersen K, Fagerlund M, Ståhl F, Charalampidis A, Söderman M, Holmin S, Babic D, Jenniskens I, Edström E, Gerdhem P
- Issue date: 2019 Apr 1
- Accuracy of augmented reality surgical navigation for minimally invasive pedicle screw insertion in the thoracic and lumbar spine with a new tracking device.
- Authors: Peh S, Chatterjea A, Pfarr J, Schäfer JP, Weuster M, Klüter T, Seekamp A, Lippross S
- Issue date: 2020 Apr
- Feasibility and Accuracy of Thoracolumbar Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Placement With Augmented Reality Navigation Technology.
- Authors: Elmi-Terander A, Nachabe R, Skulason H, Pedersen K, Söderman M, Racadio J, Babic D, Gerdhem P, Edström E
- Issue date: 2018 Jul 15
- Augmented reality navigation with intraoperative 3D imaging vs fluoroscopy-assisted free-hand surgery for spine fixation surgery: a matched-control study comparing accuracy.
- Authors: Elmi-Terander A, Burström G, Nachabé R, Fagerlund M, Ståhl F, Charalampidis A, Edström E, Gerdhem P
- Issue date: 2020 Jan 20
- Augmented and Virtual Reality Instrument Tracking for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Feasibility and Accuracy Study.
- Authors: Burström G, Nachabe R, Persson O, Edström E, Elmi Terander A
- Issue date: 2019 Aug 1