Short-term outcome after total hip arthroplasty using dual-mobility cup: report from Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Tarasevicius, SarunasSmailys, Alfredas
Grigaitis, Kazimieras
Robertsson, Otto
Stucinskas, Justinas
Issue Date
2017-01-12
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Short-term outcome after total hip arthroplasty using dual-mobility cup: report from Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register 2017, 41 (3):595 International OrthopaedicsAbstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate how the use of dual-mobility cups (DMCs) affected the risk of revision due to dislocation as well as overall risk of revision compared with a conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA) system in the short term. METHODS: A total of 12,657 primary THAs were registered from the start of 2011 to the end of 2014. 620 THAs were with DMCs. For comparison, we included all registered THAs with Exeter cup and a cemented Exeter stem combined with 28-mm femoral head. Patients were followed up with respect to revision and/or death until 1 January 2016. For survival analysis, we used revision as an endpoint. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyse the influence of various covariates (age, gender, surgical approach, THA model and pre-operative diagnosis). RESULTS: Of the 620 dual-mobility THAs and 2170 Exeter THAs, 100 had been revised. The overall unadjusted cumulative revision rate (CRR) for any reason of revision at five years after surgery was 3.9% in the dual-mobility group and 5.2% in the Exeter group. Cox regression analysis, adjusting for age, gender, THA type, surgical approach and pre-operative diagnosis, showed that the risk of revision was less in patients operated with DMCs and in patients having their operation for osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: The DM implant had a lower short-term complication rate than a conventional well defined THA. Low dislocation rate suggests that it is a good choice for high risk patients.Description
To access publisher's full text version of this article, please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field or click on the hyperlink at the top of the page marked FilesAdditional Links
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00264-016-3389-7Rights
Archived with thanks to International Orthopaedicsae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s00264-016-3389-7
Scopus Count
Collections