• English
    • íslenska
  • English 
    • English
    • íslenska
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Journal Articles, Peer Reviewed (Ritrýndar vísindagreinar)
  • English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Journal Articles, Peer Reviewed (Ritrýndar vísindagreinar)
  • English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of HirslaCommunitiesAuthorsTitleSubjectsSubject (MeSH)Issue DateJournalThis CollectionAuthorsTitleSubjectsSubject (MeSH)Issue DateJournal

My Account

LoginRegister

Local Links

FAQ - (Icelandic)FAQ - (English)Hirsla LogosAbout LandspitaliLSH Home PageLibrary HomeIcelandic Journals

Statistics

Display statistics

Biological treatment in ankylosing spondylitis in the Nordic countries during 2010-2016: a collaboration between five biological registries.

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Average rating
 
   votes
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
 
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Glintborg, B
Lindström, U
Aaltonen, K
Kristianslund, E K
Gudbjornsson, B
Chatzidionysiou, K
Askling, J
Nordström, D
Hetland, M L
Di Giuseppe, D
Dreyer, L
Kristensen, L E
Jørgensen, T S
Eklund, K
Grondal, G
Ernestam, S
Joensuu, J
Törmänen, Mrk
Skydsgaard, H
Hagfors, J
Kvien, T K
Lie, E
Fagerli, K
Geirsson, A J
Jonsson, H
Provan, S A
Krogh, N S
Jacobsson, Lth
Show allShow less
Issue Date
2018-08-02

Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
Biological treatment in ankylosing spondylitis in the Nordic countries during 2010-2016: a collaboration between five biological registries. 2018, 1-10. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2018.1444199
Abstract
Large-scale observational cohorts may be used to study the effectiveness and rare side effects of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS), but may be hampered by differences in baseline characteristics and disease activity across countries. We aimed to explore the research infrastructure in the five Nordic countries regarding bDMARD treatment in AS. This observational cohort study was based on data from biological registries in Denmark (DANBIO), Sweden (SRQ/ARTIS), Finland (ROB-FIN), Norway (NOR-DMARD), and Iceland (ICEBIO). Data were collected for the years 2010-2016. Registry coverage, registry inventory (patient characteristics, disease activity measures), and national guidelines for bDMARD prescription in AS were described per country. Incident (first line) and prevalent bDMARD use per capita, country, and year were calculated. In AS patients who started first line bDMARDs during 2010-2016 (n = 4392), baseline characteristics and disease activity measures were retrieved. Registry coverage of bDMARD-treated patients ranged from 60% to 95%. All registries included extensive prospectively collected data at patient level. Guidelines regarding choice of first line drug and prescription patterns varied across countries. During the period 2010-2016 prevalent bDMARD use increased (p < 0.001), whereas incident use tended to decrease (p for trend < 0.004), with large national variations (e.g. 2016 incidence: Iceland 10.7/100 000, Finland 1.7/100 000). Baseline characteristics were similar regarding C-reactive protein, but differed for other variables, including the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (range 3.5-6.3) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) (2.7-3.8) (both p < 0.0001). Collaboration across the five Nordic biological registries regarding bDMARD use in AS is feasible but national differences in coverage, prescription patterns, and patient characteristics must be taken into account depending on the scientific question.
Description
To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink below
Additional Links
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03009742.2018.1444199
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/03009742.2018.1444199
Scopus Count
Collections
English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)

entitlement

Related articles

  • Monitoring patients with rheumatoid arthritis in routine care: experiences from a treat-to-target strategy using the DANBIO registry.
  • Authors: Hetland ML, Jensen DV, Krogh NS
  • Issue date: 2014 Sep-Oct
  • Ankylosing Spondylitis versus Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: Comparison of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Effectiveness and Effect of HLA-B27 Status. An Observational Cohort Study from the Nationwide DANBIO Registry.
  • Authors: Glintborg B, Sørensen IJ, Østergaard M, Dreyer L, Mohamoud AA, Krogh NS, Hendricks O, Andersen LS, Raun JL, Kowalski MR, Danielsen L, Pelck R, Nordin H, Pedersen JK, Kraus DG, Christensen SR, Hansen IM, Esbesen J, Schlemmer A, Loft AG, Al Chaer N, Salomonsen L, Hetland ML
  • Issue date: 2017 Jan
  • Ankylosing spondylitis in Ireland: patient access and response to TNF-α blockers.
  • Authors: Saeed A, Khan M, Elmamoun M, Brady M, Morrissey S, Fraser AD
  • Issue date: 2012 May
  • Treatment persistence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis.
  • Authors: Machado MA, Moura CS, Ferré F, Bernatsky S, Rahme E, Acurcio Fde A
  • Issue date: 2016 Aug 22
  • Predictors of treatment response and drug continuation in 842 patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor: results from 8 years' surveillance in the Danish nationwide DANBIO registry.
  • Authors: Glintborg B, Ostergaard M, Krogh NS, Dreyer L, Kristensen HL, Hetland ML
  • Issue date: 2010 Nov

DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.