Ethical elements in priority setting in nursing care: A scoping review.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Scott, P Anne
MetadataShow full item record
CitationEthical elements in priority setting in nursing care: A scoping review. 2018, 88:25-42 Int J Nurs Stud
AbstractNurses are often responsible for the care of many patients at the same time and have to prioritise their daily nursing care activities. Prioritising the different assessed care needs and managing consequential conflicting expectations, challenges nurses' professional and moral values. To explore and illustrate the key aspects of the ethical elements of the prioritisation of nursing care and its consequences for nurses. A scoping review was used to analyse existing empirical research on the topics of priority setting, prioritisation and rationing in nursing care, including the related ethical issues. The selection of material was conducted in three stages: research identification using two data bases, CINAHL and MEDLINE. Out of 2024 citations 25 empirical research articles were analysed using inductive content analysis. Nurses prioritised patient care or participated in the decision-making at the bedside and at unit, organisational and at societal levels. Bedside priority setting, the main concern of nurses, focused on patients' daily care needs, prioritising work by essential tasks and participating in priority setting for patients' access to care. Unit level priority setting focused on processes and decisions about bed allocation and fairness. Nurses participated in organisational and societal level priority setting through discussion about the priorities. Studies revealed priorities set by nurses include prioritisation between patient groups, patients having specific diseases, the severity of the patient's situation, age, and the perceived good that treatment and care brings to patients. The negative consequences of priority setting activity were nurses' moral distress, missed care, which impacts on both patient outcomes and nursing professional practice and quality of care compromise.
DescriptionTo access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink below
- A study of nurses' ethical climate perceptions: Compromising in an uncompromising environment.
- Authors: Humphries A, Woods M
- Issue date: 2016 May
- Prioritising patient care: The different views of clinicians and managers.
- Authors: Skirbekk H, Hem MH, Nortvedt P
- Issue date: 2018 Sep
- The ethical dimension of nursing care rationing: A thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.
- Authors: Vryonides S, Papastavrou E, Charalambous A, Andreou P, Merkouris A
- Issue date: 2015 Dec
- From painful busyness to emotional immunization: Nurses' experiences of ethical challenges.
- Authors: Storaker A, Nåden D, Sæteren B
- Issue date: 2017 Aug
- The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
- Authors: Newell S, Jordan Z
- Issue date: 2015 Jan