Computerized algorithms compared with a nephrologist's diagnosis of acute kidney injury in the emergency department.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
AuthorsJonsson, Arnar Jan
Lund, Sigrun Helga
Indridason, Olafur S
MetadataShow full item record
CitationComputerized algorithms compared with a nephrologist's diagnosis of acute kidney injury in the emergency department. 2019, 60:78-82 Eur J Intern Med
AbstractThe aim of this study was to examine acute kidney injury (AKI) diagnosis based on different computerized algorithms compared with a nephrologist's diagnosis in patients visiting an emergency department (ED) of a university hospital. In this retrospective study, we used electronic medical records at the University Hospital in Reykjavik to identify all patients aged ≥18 years, who presented to the ED in the year 2010 with an elevated serum creatinine (SCr) level. All SCr values were reviewed and a nephrologist determined whether AKI was present using the KDIGO SCr criteria and clinical data. Computerized algorithms based on the KDIGO SCr criteria, accounting for various time intervals for baseline SCr and changes in follow-up SCr, were constructed using the statiscal software R. At 53,816 ED visits, SCr was measured in 15,588 patients for a total of 21,559 measurements. Elevated SCr was observed in 2878 (18.4%) patients. Strict adherence to the KDIGO SCr criteria yielded a 79% sensitivity, 94% specificity, 68% positive predictive value (PPV) and 96% negative predictive value (NPV) for the diagnosis of AKI. Allowing for a longer time frame (>365 days) for baseline SCr, resulted in 93% sensitivity, 96% specificity, 80% PPV and 99% NPV. The algorithms which included a decrease in SCr from the index ED value yielded a sensitivity of 97% but lower specificity, 74% and 80%. The algorithms that perform best yield excellent sensitivity and specificity and could be used to identify patients with AKI in the ED to enhance early diagnosis and treatment.
DescriptionTo access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink below
- Evaluation of the accuracy of estimated baseline serum creatinine for acute kidney injury diagnosis.
- Authors: Hatakeyama Y, Horino T, Nagata K, Kataoka H, Matsumoto T, Terada Y, Okuhara Y
- Issue date: 2018 Apr
- The comparison of the commonly used surrogates for baseline renal function in acute kidney injury diagnosis and staging.
- Authors: Thongprayoon C, Cheungpasitporn W, Harrison AM, Kittanamongkolchai W, Ungprasert P, Srivali N, Akhoundi A, Kashani KB
- Issue date: 2016 Jan 9
- Association of Renal Stress/Damage and Filtration Biomarkers with Subsequent AKI during Hospitalization among Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.
- Authors: Kimmel M, Shi J, Latus J, Wasser C, Kitterer D, Braun N, Alscher MD
- Issue date: 2016 Jun 6
- Comparison of absolute serum creatinine changes versus Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes consensus definitions for characterizing stages of acute kidney injury.
- Authors: Wang HE, Jain G, Glassock RJ, Warnock DG
- Issue date: 2013 Jun
- Predicting AKI in emergency admissions: an external validation study of the acute kidney injury prediction score (APS).
- Authors: Hodgson LE, Dimitrov BD, Roderick PJ, Venn R, Forni LG
- Issue date: 2017 Mar 8