• English
    • íslenska
  • English 
    • English
    • íslenska
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Journal Articles, Peer Reviewed (Ritrýndar vísindagreinar)
  • English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Journal Articles, Peer Reviewed (Ritrýndar vísindagreinar)
  • English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of HirslaCommunitiesAuthorsTitleSubjectsSubject (MeSH)Issue DateJournalThis CollectionAuthorsTitleSubjectsSubject (MeSH)Issue DateJournal

My Account

LoginRegister

Local Links

FAQ - (Icelandic)FAQ - (English)Hirsla LogosAbout LandspitaliLSH Home PageLibrary HomeIcelandic Journals

Statistics

Display statistics

Increased use of cross-sectional imaging for follow-up does not improve post-recurrence survival of surgically treated initially localized R.C.C.: results from a European multicenter database (R.E.C.U.R.).

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Average rating
 
   votes
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
 
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Dabestani, Saeed
Beisland, Christian
Stewart, Grant D
Bensalah, Karim
Gudmundsson, Eirikur
Lam, Thomas B
Gietzmann, William
Zakikhani, Paimaun
Marconi, Lorenzo
Fernandéz-Pello, Sergio
Monagas, Serenella
Williams, Samuel P
Powles, Thomas
Van Werkhoven, Erik
Meijer, Richard
Volpe, Alessandro
Staehler, Michael
Ljungberg, Börje
Bex, Axel
Show allShow less
Issue Date
2019-03-25

Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
Increased use of cross-sectional imaging for follow-up does not improve post-recurrence survival of surgically treated initially localized R.C.C.: results from a European multicenter database (R.E.C.U.R.). 2019, Mar 25:1-7. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1588919.
Abstract
Modality and frequency of image-based renal cell carcinoma (R.C.C.) follow-up strategies are based on risk of recurrence. Using the R.E.C.U.R.-database, frequency of imaging was studied in regard to prognostic risk groups. Furthermore, it was investigated whether imaging modality utilized in contemporary follow-up were associated with outcome after detection of recurrence. Moreover, outcome was compared based on whether the assessment of potential curability was a pre-defined set of criteria's (per-protocol) or stated by the investigator. Consecutive non-metastatic R.C.C. patients (n = 1,612) treated with curative intent at 12 institutes across eight European countries between 2006 and 2011 were included. Leibovich or U.I.S.S. risk group, recurrence characteristics, imaging modality, frequency and survival were recorded. Primary endpoints were overall survival (O.S.) after detection of recurrence and frequency of features associated with favourable outcome (non-symptomatic recurrences and detection within the follow-up-programme). Recurrence occurred in 336 patients. Within low, intermediate and high risk for recurrence groups, the frequency of follow-up imaging was highest in the early phase of follow-up and decreased significantly over time (p < 0.001). However, neither the image modality for detection nor ≥ 50% cross-sectional imaging during follow-up were associated with improved O.S. after recurrence. Differences between per protocol and investigator based assessment of curability did not translate into differences in O.S. As expected, the frequency of imaging was highest during early follow-up. Cross-sectional imaging use for detection of recurrences following surgery for localized R.C.C. did not improve O.S. post-recurrence. Prospective studies are needed to determine the value of imaging in follow-up.
Description
To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink below
Additional Links
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21681805.2019.1588919?journalCode=isju20
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Thomas_Lam5/publication/331995163_Increased_use_of_cross-sectional_imaging_for_follow-up_does_not_improve_post-recurrence_survival_of_surgically_treated_initially_localized_RCC_results_from_a_European_multicenter_database_RECUR/links/5caa19d1a6fdcca26d0548af/Increased-use-of-cross-sectional-imaging-for-follow-up-does-not-improve-post-recurrence-survival-of-surgically-treated-initially-localized-RCC-results-from-a-European-multicenter-database-RECUR.pdf
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/21681805.2019.1588919
Scopus Count
Collections
English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)

entitlement

 

DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.