Coexpression patterns define epigenetic regulators associated with neurological dysfunction.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Havrilla, James M
Hickey, Peter F
Quinlan, Aaron R
Bjornsson, Hans T
Hansen, Kasper D
MetadataShow full item record
CitationCoexpression patterns define epigenetic regulators associated with neurological dysfunction. 2019, 29(4):532-542 Genome Res
AbstractCoding variants in epigenetic regulators are emerging as causes of neurological dysfunction and cancer. However, a comprehensive effort to identify disease candidates within the human epigenetic machinery (EM) has not been performed; it is unclear whether features exist that distinguish between variation-intolerant and variation-tolerant EM genes, and between EM genes associated with neurological dysfunction versus cancer. Here, we rigorously define 295 genes with a direct role in epigenetic regulation (writers, erasers, remodelers, readers). Systematic exploration of these genes reveals that although individual enzymatic functions are always mutually exclusive, readers often also exhibit enzymatic activity (dual-function EM genes). We find that the majority of EM genes are very intolerant to loss-of-function variation, even when compared to the dosage sensitive transcription factors, and we identify 102 novel EM disease candidates. We show that this variation intolerance is driven by the protein domains encoding the epigenetic function, suggesting that disease is caused by a perturbed chromatin state. We then describe a large subset of EM genes that are coexpressed within multiple tissues. This subset is almost exclusively populated by extremely variation-intolerant genes and shows enrichment for dual-function EM genes. It is also highly enriched for genes associated with neurological dysfunction, even when accounting for dosage sensitivity, but not for cancer-associated EM genes. Finally, we show that regulatory regions near epigenetic regulators are genetically important for common neurological traits. These findings prioritize novel disease candidate EM genes and suggest that this coexpression plays a functional role in normal neurological homeostasis.
DescriptionTo access publisher's full text version of this article, please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field or click on the hyperlink at the top of the page marked Download
- The Mendelian disorders of the epigenetic machinery.
- Authors: Bjornsson HT
- Issue date: 2015 Oct
- Mendelian disorders of the epigenetic machinery: postnatal malleability and therapeutic prospects.
- Authors: Fahrner JA, Bjornsson HT
- Issue date: 2019 Nov 21
- Customised next-generation sequencing multigene panel to screen a large cohort of individuals with chromatin-related disorder.
- Authors: Squeo GM, Augello B, Massa V, Milani D, Colombo EA, Mazza T, Castellana S, Piccione M, Maitz S, Petracca A, Prontera P, Accadia M, Della Monica M, Di Giacomo MC, Melis D, Selicorni A, Giglio S, Fischetto R, Di Fede E, Malerba N, Russo M, Castori M, Gervasini C, Merla G
- Issue date: 2020 Nov
- 'Traffic light rules': Chromatin states direct miRNA-mediated network motifs running by integrating epigenome and regulatome.
- Authors: Zhao H, Zhang G, Pang L, Lan Y, Wang L, Yu F, Hu J, Li F, Zhao T, Xiao Y, Li X
- Issue date: 2016 Jul
- Step out of the groove: epigenetic gene control systems and engineered transcription factors.
- Authors: Verschure PJ, Visser AE, Rots MG
- Issue date: 2006