International variations in mental-health law regulating involuntary commitment of psychiatric patients as measured by the Mental Health Legislation Attitudes Scale.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Berring, Lene Lauge
MetadataShow full item record
CitationInternational variations in mental-health law regulating involuntary commitment of psychiatric patients as measured by the Mental Health Legislation Attitudes Scale. 2019, 59(2):104-114 Med Sci Law
AbstractPrevious research illustrated that the laws regulating involuntary placement and treatment of people with mental-health problems are diverse across countries. International studies comparing satisfaction levels between countries are rare. We compared the opinions of professionals and family members about the operation of the national mental-health law regulating forcibly admission and treatment of psychiatric patients in 11 countries: Ireland, Iceland, England and Wales, Romania, Slovenia, Denmark, Germany, Sweden, Norway and India. An online survey design was adopted using a Mental Health Legislation Attitudes Scale (MHLAS). This brief nine-item questionnaire was distributed via email to psychiatrists, general practitioners, acute and community mental-health nurses, tribunal members, police officers and family members in each collaborating country. The levels of agreement/disagreement were measured on a Likert scale. Data were analysed both per question and with regard to a total MHLAS 'approval' score computed as a sum of the nine questions. We found that respondents in England and Wales and Denmark expressed the highest approval for their national legislation (76% and 74%, respectively), with those in India and Ireland expressing the lowest approval (65% and 64%, respectively). Almost all countries had a more positive attitude in comparison to Ireland on the admission criteria for involuntary placement and the way people are transferred to psychiatric hospitals. There are significant variations across Europe and beyond in terms of approval for how the national mental-health law framework operates in each country.
DescriptionTo access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink below
- Qualitative exploration of stakeholders' perspectives of involuntary admission under the Mental Health Act 2001 in Ireland.
- Authors: Smyth S, Casey D, Cooney A, Higgins A, McGuinness D, Bainbridge E, Keys M, Georgieva I, Brosnan L, Beecher C, Hallahan B, McDonald C, Murphy K
- Issue date: 2017 Dec
- Public attitudes towards involuntary admission and treatment by mental health services in Norway.
- Authors: Joa I, Hustoft K, Anda LG, Brønnick K, Nielssen O, Johannessen JO, Langeveld JH
- Issue date: 2017 Nov - Dec
- Mental health legislation and human rights in England, Wales and the Republic of Ireland.
- Authors: Kelly BD
- Issue date: 2011 Nov-Dec
- Involuntary admission and treatment of patients with mental disorder.
- Authors: Zhang S, Mellsop G, Brink J, Wang X
- Issue date: 2015 Feb
- Psychiatrists' attitudes towards the procedure of involuntary admission to mental hospitals in China.
- Authors: Shao Y, Xie B, Wu Z
- Issue date: 2012 Jul