Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Útgáfudagur
2019-02
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Incidence of diverticular bleeding: a population-based study. 2019, 54(2):205-209 Scand J GastroenterolÚtdráttur
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of diverticular bleeding (DB) and examine the time trend of the incidence. Furthermore to study prognosis with regard to therapy and rebleeding. METHODS: A retrospective, population-based study of patients with DB in a National University Hospital from 2006 to 2016. Patients were identified in an electronically stored colonoscopy database. Definite diverticular bleeding was defined as active bleeding, a nonbleeding visible vessel or adherent clot. Presumptive diverticular bleeding was defined as acute painless rectal bleeding leading to hospitalization with visible diverticula but no evidence of bleeding and no other colonic lesions or bleeding sites identified on endoscopy. A 30-day re-bleeding was determined after discharge. RESULTS: A total of 3683 colonoscopy reports were reviewed, including 345 patients (males 51%) with presumptive 95% (n = 327) or definitive 5% (n = 18) diverticular bleeding. Overall 96% were treated conservatively, 3% endoscopically and 0.3% surgically. Only 5.8% of patients had a 30-day rebleed. After exclusion, 315 patients were included in the incidence calculations. The mean cumulative incidence of diverticular bleeding was 14/100,000 inhabitants per year. A time trend analysis of the incidence of DB revealed no significant change in incidence during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The mean incidence of colonic diverticular bleeding was found to be approximately 14 cases per 100,000 inhabitants and year. The incidence does not seem to have changed in the past decade. The vast majority of patients with diverticular bleeding did not require endoscopic therapy and could be managed with conservative treatment.Lu00FDsing
To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink belowae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/00365521.2019.1566494
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Urgent colonoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of severe diverticular hemorrhage.
- Authors: Jensen DM, Machicado GA, Jutabha R, Kovacs TO
- Issue date: 2000 Jan 13
- Impact of Computed Tomography Evaluation Before Colonoscopy for the Management of Colonic Diverticular Hemorrhage.
- Authors: Ichiba T, Hara M, Miyahara K, Urashima M, Shintani A, Naitou H, Higashi R
- Issue date: 2019 Feb
- Effectiveness of Conservative Treatment without Early Colonoscopy in Patients with Colonic Diverticular Hemorrhage.
- Authors: Doi H, Sasajima K, Takahashi M, Sato T, Ootsu I, Chinzei R
- Issue date: 2020
- Efficacy of Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography for the Treatment Strategy of Colonic Diverticular Bleeding.
- Authors: Sugiyama T, Hirata Y, Kojima Y, Kanno T, Kimura M, Okuda Y, Haneda K, Ikeuchi H, Morikawa T, Mochizuki H, Takada H, Sobue S
- Issue date: 2015
- Colonic diverticular hemorrhage: the hood method for detecting responsible diverticula and endoscopic band ligation for hemostasis.
- Authors: Shibata S, Shigeno T, Fujimori K, Kanai K, Yoshizawa K
- Issue date: 2014 Jan