Effects of smoking bans on passive smoking exposure at work and at home. The European Community respiratory health survey.
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Olivieri, MarioMurgia, Nicola
Carsin, Anne-Elie
Heinrich, Joachim
Benke, Geza
Bono, Roberto
Corsico, Angelo Guido
Demoly, Pascal
Forsberg, Bertil
Gislason, Thorarinn
Janson, Christer
Jõgi, Rain
Leynaert, Bénédicte
Martínez-Moratalla Rovira, Jesús
Norbäck, Dan
Nowak, Dennis
Pascual, Silvia
Pin, Isabelle
Probst-Hensch, Nicole
Raherison, Chantal
Sigsgaard, Torben
Svanes, Cecilie
Torén, Kjell
Urrutia, Isabel
Weyler, Joost
Jarvis, Deborah
Zock, Jan-Paul
Verlato, Giuseppe
Issue Date
2019-07
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Effects of smoking bans on passive smoking exposure at work and at home. The European Community respiratory health survey. 2019, 29(4):670-679 Indoor AirAbstract
This longitudinal study investigated whether smoking bans influence passive smoking at work and/or at home in the same subjects. Passive smoking at work and/or at home was investigated in random population samples (European Community Respiratory Health Survey) in 1990-1995, with follow-up interviews in 1998-2003 and 2010-2014. National smoking bans were classified as partial (restricted to public workplaces) or global (extended to private workplaces). Multivariable analysis was accomplished by three-level logistic regression models, where level-1, level-2, and level-3 units were, respectively, questionnaire responses, subjects, and centers. Passive smoking at work was reported by 31.9% in 1990-1995, 17.5% in 1998-2003, and 2.5% in 2010-2014. Concurrently, passive smoking at home decreased from 28.9% to 18.2% and 8.8%. When controlling for sex, age, education, smoking status, and ECHRS wave, the odds of passive smoking at work was markedly reduced after global smoking bans (OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.81), particularly among non-smokers, while the protective effect of global smoking bans on passive smoking at home was only detected in non-smokers. Smoking bans both in public and private workplaces were effective in reducing passive smoking at work in Europe. However, given the inefficacy of smoking bans in current smokers' dwellings, better strategies are needed to avoid smoking indoors.Description
To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink belowAdditional Links
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ina.12556ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/ina.12556
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Attitudes of Korean smokers towards smoke-free public places: findings from the longitudinal ITC Korea Survey, 2005-2010.
- Authors: Park E, Cho SI, Seo HG, Kim Y, Jung HS, Driezen P, Ouimet J, Quah ACK, Fong GT
- Issue date: 2019 Aug 10
- Self-Reported Exposure to Secondhand Smoke and Support for Complete Smoking Bans in Multiunit Housing Among Smokers in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.
- Authors: Driezen P, Fong GT, Hyland A, Craig LV, Sansone G, Hitchman SC, Cummings KM
- Issue date: 2020 Nov 25
- Secondhand smoke exposure and support for smoke-free policies in cities and rural areas of China from 2009 to 2015: a population-based cohort study (the ITC China Survey).
- Authors: Sansone G, Fong GT, Yan M, Meng G, Craig L, Xu SS, Quah ACK, Wu C, Feng G, Jiang Y
- Issue date: 2019 Dec 11
- Impact of national smoke-free legislation on home smoking bans: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Europe Surveys.
- Authors: Mons U, Nagelhout GE, Allwright S, Guignard R, van den Putte B, Willemsen MC, Fong GT, Brenner H, Pötschke-Langer M, Breitling LP
- Issue date: 2013 May
- Impact of institutional smoking bans on reducing harms and secondhand smoke exposure.
- Authors: Frazer K, McHugh J, Callinan JE, Kelleher C
- Issue date: 2016 May 27