Clinical characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer with double somatic mismatch repair mutations compared with Lynch syndrome.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
de la Chapelle, Albert
Jonasson, Jon G
Frankel, Wendy L
Pritchard, Colin C
MetadataShow full item record
CitationClinical characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer with double somatic mismatch repair mutations compared with Lynch syndrome. 2019, 56(7):462-470 J Med Genet
AbstractBACKGROUND: Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumours without MLH1 methylation or germline MMR pathogenic variants (PV) were previously thought to have Lynch syndrome (LS). It is now appreciated that they can have double somatic (DS) MMR PVs. We explored the clinical characteristics between patients with DS tumours and LS in two population-based cohorts. METHODS: We included patients with CRC from Ohio 2013-2016 and Iceland 2000-2009. All had microsatellite instability testing and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC) of MMR proteins, and MLH1 methylation testing when indicated. Germline next-generation sequencing was performed for all with dMMR tumours; tumour sequencing followed for patients with unexplained dMMR. Clinical characteristics of DS patients and patients with LS were compared. RESULTS: Of the 232 and 51 patients with non-methylated dMMR tumours in the Ohio and Iceland cohorts, respectively, 57.8% (n=134) and 45.1% (n=23) had LS, 32.8% (n=76) and 31.4% (n=16) had DS PVs, 6% (n=14) and 9.8% (n=5) were unexplained and 4.3% (n=10) and 13.7% (n=7) had incorrect IHC. Age of diagnosis for DS patients was older than patients with LS (p=3.73×10-4) in the two cohorts. Patients with LS were more likely to meet Amsterdam II criteria (OR=15.81, p=8.47×10-6) and have multiple LS-associated tumours (OR=6.67, p=3.31×10-5). Absence of MLH1/PMS2 was predictive of DS PVs; isolated MSH6 and PMS2 absence was predictive of LS in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with LS are 15× more likely to meet Amsterdam II criteria and >5× more likely to have multiple cancers as compared with those with DS tumours. Furthermore, isolated loss of MSH6 or PMS2 protein predicts LS.
DescriptionTo access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink below
- Double somatic mismatch repair gene pathogenic variants as common as Lynch syndrome among endometrial cancer patients.
- Authors: Hampel H, Pearlman R, de la Chapelle A, Pritchard CC, Zhao W, Jones D, Yilmaz A, Chen W, Frankel WL, Suarez AA, Cosgrove C, Backes F, Copeland L, Fowler J, O'Malley D, Salani R, McElroy JP, Stanich PP, Goodfellow P, Cohn DE
- Issue date: 2021 Jan
- Clinical and molecular characterisation of hereditary and sporadic metastatic colorectal cancers harbouring microsatellite instability/DNA mismatch repair deficiency.
- Authors: Cohen R, Buhard O, Cervera P, Hain E, Dumont S, Bardier A, Bachet JB, Gornet JM, Lopez-Trabada D, Dumont S, Kaci R, Bertheau P, Renaud F, Bibeau F, Parc Y, Vernerey D, Duval A, Svrcek M, André T
- Issue date: 2017 Nov
- Lessons learnt from implementation of a Lynch syndrome screening program for patients with gynaecological malignancy.
- Authors: Najdawi F, Crook A, Maidens J, McEvoy C, Fellowes A, Pickett J, Ho M, Nevell D, McIlroy K, Sheen A, Sioson L, Ahadi M, Turchini J, Clarkson A, Hogg R, Valmadre S, Gard G, Dooley SJ, Scott RJ, Fox SB, Field M, Gill AJ
- Issue date: 2017 Aug
- Tumor testing to identify lynch syndrome in two Australian colorectal cancer cohorts.
- Authors: Buchanan DD, Clendenning M, Rosty C, Eriksen SV, Walsh MD, Walters RJ, Thibodeau SN, Stewart J, Preston S, Win AK, Flander L, Ouakrim DA, Macrae FA, Boussioutas A, Winship IM, Giles GG, Hopper JL, Southey MC, English D, Jenkins MA
- Issue date: 2017 Feb
- The proportion of endometrial tumours associated with Lynch syndrome (PETALS): A prospective cross-sectional study.
- Authors: Ryan NAJ, McMahon R, Tobi S, Snowsill T, Esquibel S, Wallace AJ, Bunstone S, Bowers N, Mosneag IE, Kitson SJ, O'Flynn H, Ramchander NC, Sivalingam VN, Frayling IM, Bolton J, McVey RJ, Evans DG, Crosbie EJ
- Issue date: 2020 Sep