• English
    • íslenska
  • English 
    • English
    • íslenska
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Journal Articles, Peer Reviewed (Ritrýndar vísindagreinar)
  • English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Journal Articles, Peer Reviewed (Ritrýndar vísindagreinar)
  • English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of HirslaCommunitiesAuthorsTitleSubjectsSubject (MeSH)Issue DateJournalThis CollectionAuthorsTitleSubjectsSubject (MeSH)Issue DateJournal

My Account

LoginRegister

Local Links

FAQ - (Icelandic)FAQ - (English)Hirsla LogosAbout LandspitaliLSH Home PageLibrary HomeIcelandic Journals

Statistics

Display statistics

Clinical characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer with double somatic mismatch repair mutations compared with Lynch syndrome.

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Average rating
 
   votes
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
 
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Pearlman, Rachel
Haraldsdottir, Sigurdis
de la Chapelle, Albert
Jonasson, Jon G
Liyanarachchi, Sandya
Frankel, Wendy L
Rafnar, Thorunn
Stefansson, Kari
Pritchard, Colin C
Hampel, Heather
Issue Date
2019-07

Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
Clinical characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer with double somatic mismatch repair mutations compared with Lynch syndrome. 2019, 56(7):462-470 J Med Genet
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumours without MLH1 methylation or germline MMR pathogenic variants (PV) were previously thought to have Lynch syndrome (LS). It is now appreciated that they can have double somatic (DS) MMR PVs. We explored the clinical characteristics between patients with DS tumours and LS in two population-based cohorts. METHODS: We included patients with CRC from Ohio 2013-2016 and Iceland 2000-2009. All had microsatellite instability testing and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC) of MMR proteins, and MLH1 methylation testing when indicated. Germline next-generation sequencing was performed for all with dMMR tumours; tumour sequencing followed for patients with unexplained dMMR. Clinical characteristics of DS patients and patients with LS were compared. RESULTS: Of the 232 and 51 patients with non-methylated dMMR tumours in the Ohio and Iceland cohorts, respectively, 57.8% (n=134) and 45.1% (n=23) had LS, 32.8% (n=76) and 31.4% (n=16) had DS PVs, 6% (n=14) and 9.8% (n=5) were unexplained and 4.3% (n=10) and 13.7% (n=7) had incorrect IHC. Age of diagnosis for DS patients was older than patients with LS (p=3.73×10-4) in the two cohorts. Patients with LS were more likely to meet Amsterdam II criteria (OR=15.81, p=8.47×10-6) and have multiple LS-associated tumours (OR=6.67, p=3.31×10-5). Absence of MLH1/PMS2 was predictive of DS PVs; isolated MSH6 and PMS2 absence was predictive of LS in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with LS are 15× more likely to meet Amsterdam II criteria and >5× more likely to have multiple cancers as compared with those with DS tumours. Furthermore, isolated loss of MSH6 or PMS2 protein predicts LS.
Description
To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink below
Additional Links
https://jmg.bmj.com/content/56/7/462
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105698
Scopus Count
Collections
English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)

entitlement

Related articles

  • Clinical and molecular characterisation of hereditary and sporadic metastatic colorectal cancers harbouring microsatellite instability/DNA mismatch repair deficiency.
  • Authors: Cohen R, Buhard O, Cervera P, Hain E, Dumont S, Bardier A, Bachet JB, Gornet JM, Lopez-Trabada D, Dumont S, Kaci R, Bertheau P, Renaud F, Bibeau F, Parc Y, Vernerey D, Duval A, Svrcek M, André T
  • Issue date: 2017 Nov
  • Lessons learnt from implementation of a Lynch syndrome screening program for patients with gynaecological malignancy.
  • Authors: Najdawi F, Crook A, Maidens J, McEvoy C, Fellowes A, Pickett J, Ho M, Nevell D, McIlroy K, Sheen A, Sioson L, Ahadi M, Turchini J, Clarkson A, Hogg R, Valmadre S, Gard G, Dooley SJ, Scott RJ, Fox SB, Field M, Gill AJ
  • Issue date: 2017 Aug
  • Tumor testing to identify lynch syndrome in two Australian colorectal cancer cohorts.
  • Authors: Buchanan DD, Clendenning M, Rosty C, Eriksen SV, Walsh MD, Walters RJ, Thibodeau SN, Stewart J, Preston S, Win AK, Flander L, Ouakrim DA, Macrae FA, Boussioutas A, Winship IM, Giles GG, Hopper JL, Southey MC, English D, Jenkins MA
  • Issue date: 2017 Feb
  • The proportion of endometrial tumours associated with Lynch syndrome (PETALS): A prospective cross-sectional study.
  • Authors: Ryan NAJ, McMahon R, Tobi S, Snowsill T, Esquibel S, Wallace AJ, Bunstone S, Bowers N, Mosneag IE, Kitson SJ, O'Flynn H, Ramchander NC, Sivalingam VN, Frayling IM, Bolton J, McVey RJ, Evans DG, Crosbie EJ
  • Issue date: 2020 Sep
  • Histology of colorectal adenocarcinoma with double somatic mismatch-repair mutations is indistinguishable from those caused by Lynch syndrome.
  • Authors: Hemminger JA, Pearlman R, Haraldsdottir S, Knight D, Jonasson JG, Pritchard CC, Hampel H, Frankel WL
  • Issue date: 2018 Aug

DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.