Identifying out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with no chance of survival: An independent validation of prediction rules.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
AuthorsHreinsson, Johann P
Thorvaldsson, Asgeir P
Fridriksson, Brynjar T
Libungan, Berglind G
MetadataShow full item record
CitationHreinsson JP, Thorvaldsson AP, Magnusson V, Fridriksson BT, Libungan BG, Karason S. Identifying out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with no chance of survival: An independent validation of prediction rules. Resuscitation. 2020;146:19–25. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.11.001
AbstractBackground: The Basic life support (BLS) and Advanced life support (ALS) are known prediction rules for termination of resuscitation (TOR) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Recently, a new rule was developed by Jabre et al. We aimed to independently validate and compare the predictive accuracy of these rules. Methods: OHCA cases in Iceland from 2008 to 2017 from a population-based, prospectively registered database. Primary outcome was survival to discharge among patients that met all conditions of abovementioned rules: BLS (not witnessed by EMS personnel, no defibrillation nor ROSC before transport), ALS (BLS criteria plus not witnessed nor CPR by bystander) and Jabre (not witnessed by EMS personnel, initial rhythm non-shockable, no sustainable ROSC before third dose of adrenaline). Results: Overall, 568 OHCA patients were included in validation of TOR rules. Mean age 67, males 74%, witnessed by EMS 11%, by bystander 66% that attempted CPR in 50%, transported to hospital 60%, overall survival 20%. All rules had high specificity for mortality, 99.6-100% (95%CI 95-100). The Jabre and BLS rules had similar sensitivity 47% (43-52) vs. 44% (40-49), respectively, the sensitivity of ALS was lower, 8% (5-11). Combined use of positive BLS and Jabre rules performed the best, identifying 88/226 (39%) of futile cases transported to hospital, specificity 100% (97-100) and sensitivity 59% (55-64). Conclusions: The accuracy of the BLS and Jabre TOR rules to predict mortality after OHCA is very good and their combined use may be superior to the use of either one.
DescriptionTo access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink below
RightsCopyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
- Derivation and evaluation of a termination of resuscitation clinical prediction rule for advanced life support providers.
- Authors: Morrison LJ, Verbeek PR, Vermeulen MJ, Kiss A, Allan KS, Nesbitt L, Stiell I
- Issue date: 2007 Aug
- External validation of multimodal termination of resuscitation rules for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in the COVID-19 era.
- Authors: Jung H, Lee MJ, Cho JW, Lee SH, Lee SH, Mun YH, Chung HS, Kim YH, Kim GM, Park SY, Jeon JC, Kim C, WinCOVID-19 consortium.
- Issue date: 2021 Jan 27
- Field termination-of-resuscitation rule for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Japan.
- Authors: Goto Y, Funada A, Maeda T, Okada H, Goto Y
- Issue date: 2019 Mar
- Termination of Resuscitation Rules to Predict Neurological Outcomes in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest for an Intermediate Life Support Prehospital System.
- Authors: Cheong RW, Li H, Doctor NE, Ng YY, Goh ES, Leong BS, Gan HN, Foo D, Tham LP, Charles R, Ong ME
- Issue date: 2016 Sep-Oct
- Predictive performance of universal termination of resuscitation rules in an Asian community: are they accurate enough?
- Authors: Chiang WC, Ko PC, Chang AM, Liu SS, Wang HC, Yang CW, Hsieh MJ, Chen SY, Lai MS, Ma MH
- Issue date: 2015 Apr