• English
    • íslenska
  • English 
    • English
    • íslenska
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Journal Articles, Peer Reviewed (Ritrýndar vísindagreinar)
  • English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Journal Articles, Peer Reviewed (Ritrýndar vísindagreinar)
  • English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of HirslaCommunitiesAuthorsTitleSubjectsSubject (MeSH)Issue DateJournalThis CollectionAuthorsTitleSubjectsSubject (MeSH)Issue DateJournal

My Account

LoginRegister

Local Links

FAQ - (Icelandic)FAQ - (English)Hirsla LogosAbout LandspitaliLSH Home PageLibrary HomeIcelandic Journals

Statistics

Display statistics

Effect of two different nutritional supplements on postprandial glucose response and energy- and protein intake in hospitalised patients with COPD: A randomised cross-over study.

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Average rating
 
   votes
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
 
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Ingadottir, Arora Ros
Bjorgvinsdottir, Eva Bjorg
Beck, Anne Marie
Baldwin, Christine
Weekes, C Elizabeth
Geirsdottir, Olof Gudny
Ramel, Alfons
Birgisdottir, Bryndis Eva
Gislason, Thorarinn
Gunnarsdottir, Ingibjorg
Issue Date
2019-04-25

Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
Ingadottir AR, Bjorgvinsdottir EB, Beck AM, et al. Effect of two different nutritional supplements on postprandial glucose response and energy- and protein intake in hospitalised patients with COPD: A randomised cross-over study. Clin Nutr. 2020;39(4):1085‐1091. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2019.04.010
Abstract
Introduction: Oral nutrition support is frequently used in treatment of malnutrition in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Considering the use of corticoidsteroids in patients with COPD, little is known about the effect on postprandial glucose response and if they might interfere with glucose control. Our aims were to compare the effect of a liquid oral nutritional supplement (ONS) and semi solid inbetween meal snack (snack) on postprandial glucose and energy- and protein intake, and to compare the effect of timing of each intervention on postprandial glucose and energy- and protein intake. Methods: Patients with COPD (n = 17) admitted to the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Iceland and defined as at low or medium nutritional risk (score 0-3) were recruited. In a randomised cross-over design, subjects consumed ONS or snack either in a fasting state (study 1) or following breakfast (study 2) and postprandial glucose responses were assessed at regular intervals for two hours (t = 15, t = 30, t = 45, t = 60, t = 90, t = 120 min). Energy- and protein intake was estimated using a validated plate diagram sheet. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test was used to compare the two interventions. Results: In study 2, following breakfast, postprandial glucose was significantly higher after consuming ONS than the snack after 60 min (9.7 ± 2.4 mmol/L vs. 8.2 ± 3.2 mmol/L, p = 0.013 and 120 min 9.2 ± 3.2 mmol/L vs. 7.9 ± 2.4 mmol/L, p = 0.021, respectively). No difference was found in postprandial glucose concentrations between ONS and the snack when consumed after overnight fasting (study 1). No difference in energy or protein intake from hospital food was seen between supplement types neither in study 1 or 2. Conclusion: Lower postprandial glucose concentrations were associated with the snack compared to ONS when taken after a meal compared to either type directly after overnight fasting. The clinical relevance of higher postprandial blood glucose after consuming a liquid ONS after breakfast compared with a semi solid snack needs to be studied further.
Description
To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink below
Additional Links
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561419301839?via%3Dihub
Rights
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.clnu.2019.04.010
Scopus Count
Collections
English Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed)

entitlement

Related articles

  • Oral nutrition supplements and between-meal snacks for nutrition therapy in patients with COPD identified as at nutritional risk: a randomised feasibility trial.
  • Authors: Ingadottir AR, Beck AM, Baldwin C, Weekes CE, Geirsdottir OG, Ramel A, Gislason T, Gunnarsdottir I
  • Issue date: 2019
  • Association of energy and protein intakes with length of stay, readmission and mortality in hospitalised patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
  • Authors: Ingadottir AR, Beck AM, Baldwin C, Weekes CE, Geirsdottir OG, Ramel A, Gislason T, Gunnarsdottir I
  • Issue date: 2018 Mar
  • Long-term use of a diabetes-specific oral nutritional supplement results in a low-postprandial glucose response in diabetes patients.
  • Authors: Magnoni D, Rouws CH, Lansink M, van Laere KM, Campos AC
  • Issue date: 2008 Apr
  • Short-term effects of a low glycemic index carob-containing snack on energy intake, satiety, and glycemic response in normal-weight, healthy adults: Results from two randomized trials.
  • Authors: Papakonstantinou E, Orfanakos N, Farajian P, Kapetanakou AE, Makariti IP, Grivokostopoulos N, Ha MA, Skandamis PN
  • Issue date: 2017 Oct
  • Educational nutrition messaging at breakfast reduces snack intake and influences snack preferences in adult men and women.
  • Authors: Baum JI, Gaines BL, Kubas GC, Mitchell CF, Russell SL
  • Issue date: 2017 Oct 1

DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.