Using Robson's Ten-Group Classification System for comparing caesarean section rates in Europe: an analysis of routine data from the Euro-Peristat study.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Sól Ólafsdóttir, H
MetadataShow full item record
CitationZeitlin J, Durox M, Macfarlane A, Alexander S, Heller G, Loghi M, et al. Using Robson's Ten-Group Classification System for comparing caesarean section rates in Europe: an analysis of routine data from the Euro-Peristat study. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2020.doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16634.
AbstractObjective: Robson's Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) creates clinically relevant sub-groups for monitoring caesarean birth rates. This study assesses whether this classification can be derived from routine data in Europe and uses it to analyse national caesarean rates. Design: Observational study using routine data. Setting: Twenty-seven EU member states plus Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and the UK. Population: All births at ≥22 weeks of gestational age in 2015. Methods: National statistical offices and medical birth registers derived numbers of caesarean births in TGCS groups. Main outcome measures: Overall caesarean rate, prevalence and caesarean rates in each of the TGCS groups. Results: Of 31 countries, 18 were able to provide data on the TGCS groups, with UK data available only from Northern Ireland. Caesarean birth rates ranged from 16.1 to 56.9%. Countries providing TGCS data had lower caesarean rates than countries without data (25.8% versus 32.9%, P = 0.04). Countries with higher caesarean rates tended to have higher rates in all TGCS groups. Substantial heterogeneity was observed, however, especially for groups 5 (previous caesarean section), 6, 7 (nulliparous/multiparous breech) and 10 (singleton cephalic preterm). The differences in percentages of abnormal lies, group 9, illustrate potential misclassification arising from unstandardised definitions. Conclusions: Although further validation of data quality is needed, using TGCS in Europe provides valuable comparator and baseline data for benchmarking and surveillance. Higher caesarean rates in countries unable to construct the TGCS suggest that effective routine information systems may be an indicator of a country's investment in implementing evidence-based caesarean policies. Tweetable abstract: Many European countries can provide Robson's Ten-Group Classification to improve caesarean rate comparisons. Keywords: Caesarean birth; Europe; Robson classification; Ten-Group Classification System; health information systems; perinatal health indicators.
DescriptionTo access publisher's full text version of this article, please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field or click on the hyperlink at the top of the page marked Download
Rights© 2021 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
- Risk adjustment models for interhospital comparison of CS rates using Robson's ten group classification system and other socio-demographic and clinical variables.
- Authors: Colais P, Fantini MP, Fusco D, Carretta E, Stivanello E, Lenzi J, Pieri G, Perucci CA
- Issue date: 2012 Jun 21
- Examining Cesarean Delivery Rates Using the Robson's Ten-group Classification.
- Authors: Yadav RG, Maitra N
- Issue date: 2016 Oct
- Midwifery-led care can lower caesarean section rates according to the Robson ten group classification system.
- Authors: Hanahoe M
- Issue date: 2020
- Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study.
- Authors: Zimmo MW, Laine K, Hassan S, Bottcher B, Fosse E, Ali-Masri H, Zimmo K, Sørum Falk R, Lieng M, Vikanes Å
- Issue date: 2018 Oct 24
- Analysing the likelihood of caesarean birth after implementation of the two-childbirth policy in China, using the Ten Group Classification System.
- Authors: Wen J, Chen Q, Luo Q
- Issue date: 2020 Apr