Vesicourethral Anastomotic Stenosis After Open or Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Retropubic Prostatectomy-Results from the Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial.
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Modig, Katarina KossGodtman, Rebecka Arnsrud
Bjartell, Anders
Carlsson, Stefan
Haglind, Eva
Hugosson, Jonas
Månsson, Marianne
Steineck, Gunnar
Thorsteinsdottir, Thordis
Tyritzis, Stavros
Lantz, Anna Wallerstedt
Wiklund, Peter
Stranne, Johan
Issue Date
2019-11-09
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Modig KK, Godtman RA, Bjartell A, Carlsson S, Haglind E, Hugosson J, Månsson M, Steineck G, Thorsteinsdottir T, Tyritzis S, Lantz AW, Wiklund P, Stranne J. Vesicourethral Anastomotic Stenosis After Open or Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Retropubic Prostatectomy-Results from the Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial. Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Mar;7(2):317-324. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.10.012.Abstract
Background: Vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis is a well-known late complication after open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) with previously reported incidences of 2.7-15%. There are few reports of the incidence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) compared with RRP. Objective: The aim was to compare the risk of developing symptomatic stenosis after RRP and RALP, and to explore potential risk factors and the influence of stenosis on the risk of urinary incontinence. Design, setting, and participants: Between 2008 and 2011, 4003 men were included in a prospective trial comparing RRP and RALP at 14 Swedish centres. Clinical data and patient questionnaires were collected before, during, and after surgery. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Stenosis was identified by either patients' reports in questionnaires or case report forms. The primary endpoint is reported as unadjusted as well as adjusted relative risks (RRs), calculated with log-binomial regression models. Data on incontinence were analysed by means of a log-binomial regression model, with stenosis as an independent and incontinence as a dependent variable. Results and limitations: Symptomatic stenosis developed in 1.9% of 3706 evaluable men within 24 mo. The risk was 2.2 times higher after RRP than after RALP (RR 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-3.53). Overall, urinary incontinence was twice as common in patients who had stenosis (RR 2.01, 95% CI 1.43-2.64). Conclusions: This large prospective study found an overall low rate of vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis after radical prostatectomy, but the rate was significantly lower after robot-assisted prostatectomy. The risk of stenosis seems to be associated with the number of sutures/takes in the anastomosis, but this was statistically significant only in the RALP group. Patient summary: We investigated the risk of developing vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis after open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. We found that the risk was generally lower than previously reported and lower after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy than after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urinary incontinence was twice as common in patients with stenosis. Keywords: Anastomotic stenosis; Prostate cancer; Robotic surgery.Description
To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink belowRights
Copyright © 2019 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.euf.2019.10.012
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled, Nonrandomised Trial.
- Authors: Haglind E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Wallerstedt A, Wilderäng U, Thorsteinsdottir T, Lagerkvist M, Damber JE, Bjartell A, Hugosson J, Wiklund P, Steineck G, LAPPRO steering committee.
- Issue date: 2015 Aug
- Functional and Oncological Outcomes After Open Versus Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer: 8-Year Follow-up.
- Authors: Lantz A, Bock D, Akre O, Angenete E, Bjartell A, Carlsson S, Modig KK, Nyberg M, Kollberg KS, Steineck G, Stranne J, Wiklund P, Haglind E
- Issue date: 2021 Nov
- Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Between Open and Robotic Radical Prostatectomy at 24-month Follow-up in the Swedish LAPPRO Trial.
- Authors: Nyberg M, Hugosson J, Wiklund P, Sjoberg D, Wilderäng U, Carlsson SV, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Steineck G, Haglind E, Bjartell A, LAPPRO group.
- Issue date: 2018 Oct
- Health Economic Analysis of Open and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Prostate Cancer Within the Prospective Multicentre LAPPRO Trial.
- Authors: Forsmark A, Gehrman J, Angenete E, Bjartell A, Björholt I, Carlsson S, Hugosson J, Marlow T, Stinesen-Kollberg K, Stranne J, Wallerstedt A, Wiklund P, Wilderäng U, Haglind E
- Issue date: 2018 Dec
- Benchmarks for operative outcomes of robotic and open radical prostatectomy: results from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study.
- Authors: Alemozaffar M, Sanda M, Yecies D, Mucci LA, Stampfer MJ, Kenfield SA
- Issue date: 2015 Mar