Should patients with low-risk renal cell carcinoma be followed differently after nephron-sparing surgery vs radical nephrectomy?
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Stewart, Grant D
Lam, Thomas B L
Meijer, Richard P
MetadataShow full item record
CitationA, Ljungberg B, Klatte T, Bensalah K, Dabestani S, Bex A. Should patients with low-risk renal cell carcinoma be followed differently after nephron-sparing surgery vs radical nephrectomy? BJU Int. 2021 Apr 1. doi: 10.1111/bju.15415. Epub ahead of print.
ÚtdrátturObjective: To investigate whether pT1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) should be followed differently after partial (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) based on a retrospective analysis of a multicentre database (RECUR). Subjects: A retrospective study was conducted in 3380 patients treated for nonmetastatic RCC between January 2006 and December 2011 across 15 centres from 10 countries, as part of the RECUR database project. For patients with pT1 clear-cell RCC, patterns of recurrence were compared between RN and PN according to recurrence site. Univariate and multivariate models were used to evaluate the association between surgical approach and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Results: From the database 1995 patients were identified as low-risk patients (pT1, pN0, pNx), of whom 1055 (52.9%) underwent PN. On multivariate analysis, features associated with worse RFS included tumour size (hazard ratio [HR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-1.39; P < 0.001), nuclear grade (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.73-3.08; P < 0.001), tumour necrosis (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.03-2.3; P = 0.037), vascular invasion (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.3-4.4; P = 0.005) and positive surgical margins (HR 4.4, 95% CI 2.3-8.5; P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis of CSM revealed that the survival of patients with recurrence after PN was significantly better than those with recurrence after RN (P = 0.02). While the above-mentioned risk factors were associated with prognosis, type of surgery alone was not an independent prognostic variable for RFS nor CSM. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study. Conclusion: Our results showed that follow-up protocols should not rely solely on stage and type of primary surgery. An optimized regimen should also include validated risk factors rather than type of surgery alone to select the best imaging method and to avoid unnecessary imaging. A follow-up of more than 3 years should be considered in patients with pT1 tumours after RN. A novel follow-up strategy is proposed. Keywords: #Kidney Cancer; #kcsm; #uroonc; RECUR; follow up; guidelines; partial nephrectomy; radical nephrectomy; renal cell carcinoma; survival.
Lu00FDsingTo access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink below
Rights© 2021 The Authors BJU International © 2021 BJU International.
- The Impact of Histological Subtype on the Incidence, Timing, and Patterns of Recurrence in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma After Surgery-Results from RECUR Consortium.
- Authors: Abu-Ghanem Y, Powles T, Capitanio U, Beisland C, Järvinen P, Stewart GD, Gudmundsson EO, Lam TB, Marconi L, Fernandéz-Pello S, Nisen H, Meijer RP, Volpe A, Ljungberg B, Klatte T, Dabestani S, Bex A
- Issue date: 2021 Jun
- Evaluation of the prognostic significance of perirenal fat invasion and tumor size in patients with pT1-pT3a localized renal cell carcinoma in a comprehensive multicenter study of the CORONA project. Can we improve prognostic discrimination for patients with stage pT3a tumors?
- Authors: Brookman-May SD, May M, Wolff I, Zigeuner R, Hutterer GC, Cindolo L, Schips L, De Cobelli O, Rocco B, De Nunzio C, Tubaro A, Coman I, Truss M, Dalpiaz O, Feciche B, Figenshau RS, Madison K, Sánchez-Chapado M, Santiago Martin Mdel C, Salzano L, Lotrecchiano G, Zastrow S, Wirth M, Sountoulides P, Shariat S, Waidelich R, Stief C, Gunia S, CORONA Project., European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Group.
- Issue date: 2015 May
- Features associated with recurrence beyond 5 years after nephrectomy and nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: development and internal validation of a risk model (PRELANE score) to predict late recurrence based on a large multicenter database (CORONA/SATURN Project).
- Authors: Brookman-May S, May M, Shariat SF, Xylinas E, Stief C, Zigeuner R, Chromecki T, Burger M, Wieland WF, Cindolo L, Schips L, De Cobelli O, Rocco B, De Nunzio C, Feciche B, Truss M, Gilfrich C, Pahernik S, Hohenfellner M, Zastrow S, Wirth MP, Novara G, Carini M, Minervini A, Simeone C, Antonelli A, Mirone V, Longo N, Simonato A, Carmignani G, Ficarra V, Members of the CORONA project and the SATURN project.
- Issue date: 2013 Sep
- Survival after partial and radical nephrectomy for the treatment of stage T1bN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the USA: a propensity scoring approach.
- Authors: Badalato GM, Kates M, Wisnivesky JP, Choudhury AR, McKiernan JM
- Issue date: 2012 May
- Three-dimensional tumour volume and cancer-specific survival for patients undergoing nephrectomy to treat pT1 clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.
- Authors: Jorns J, Thiel DD, Lohse CM, Williams A, Arnold ML, Cheville JC, Leibovich BC, Parker AS
- Issue date: 2012 Oct